CVE-2020-26939: In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.92% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 60.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: bouncycastle (Debian:12) 1.61-1; bouncycastle (Debian:9) 1.56-1+deb9u3; org.bouncycastle:bc-fips (Maven) 1.0.2.
- Mentioned 3 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to bouncycastle (Debian:12) 1.61-1; bouncycastle (Debian:9) 1.56-1+deb9u3; org.bouncycastle:bc-fips (Maven) 1.0.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent because of Observable Differences in Behavior to Error Inputs. This occurs in org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. Sending invalid ciphertext that decrypts to a short payload in the OAEP Decoder could result in the throwing of an early exception, potentially leaking some information about the private exponent of the RSA private key performing the encryption.
- Published
- Nov 2, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 60th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-203
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| bouncycastle | fips java api | cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:fips_java_api |
| bouncycastle | legion-of-the-bouncy-castle | cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- bouncycastle fips java apibefore 1.0.1.2
- bouncycastle legion-of-the-bouncy-castlebefore 1.61
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | bouncycastle | before 1.61-1 | 1.61-1 |
| Debian:9 | bouncycastle | before 1.56-1+deb9u3 | 1.56-1+deb9u3 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bc-fips | before 1.0.2 | 1.0.2 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-ext-jdk15on | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-ext-jdk16 | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk14 | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15 | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15to18 | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk16 | before 1.61 | 1.61 |
Same product
bouncycastle: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-45146An issue was discovered in the FIPS Java API of Bouncy Castle BC-FJA before 1.0.2.4.22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:bouncycastle | 1.61-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bc-fips | 1.0.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-ext-jdk15on | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-ext-jdk16 | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk14 | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15 | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15to18 | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk16 | 1.61 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0594 · Sep 7, 2022(IBM Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
- TR-21-0166 · Feb 23, 2021(IBM Güvenlik Bülteni Yayınladı)
- TR-21-0157 · Feb 22, 2021(IBM Güvenlik Bülteni Yayınladı)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-203 · Observable DiscrepancyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.