CVE-2020-26422: Buffer overflow in QUIC dissector in Wireshark 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 91.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: wireshark (openSUSE:Leap 15.2) 3.4.5-lp152.2.12.1; sbc (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 1.3-3.2.1; wireshark (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 3.4.5-3.53.1.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to wireshark (openSUSE:Leap 15.2) 3.4.5-lp152.2.12.1; sbc (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 1.3-3.2.1; wireshark (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 3.4.5-3.53.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Dec 21, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.7% · 91th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.7%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.3
- CNA · GitLab
- 3.7
- 1.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| wireshark | wireshark | cpe:2.3:a:wireshark:wireshark |
| oracle | zfs storage appliance kit | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:zfs_storage_appliance_kit |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- oracle zfs storage appliance kit8.8
- wireshark wireshark3.4.0
- wireshark wireshark3.4.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitLab). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The Wireshark Foundation Wireshark
- >=3.4.0, <3.4.2affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | wireshark | before 3.4.5-lp152.2.12.1 | 3.4.5-lp152.2.12.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | sbc | before 1.3-3.2.1 | 1.3-3.2.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | wireshark | before 3.4.5-3.53.1 | 3.4.5-3.53.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | libqt5-qtmultimedia | before 5.9.7-7.2.1 | 5.9.7-7.2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOS | libvirt | before 4.0.0-9.37.21 | 4.0.0-9.37.21 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | sbc | before 1.3-3.2.1 | 1.3-3.2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | wireshark | before 3.4.5-3.53.1 | 3.4.5-3.53.1 |
Same product
wireshark: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2010-0304Multiple buffer overflows in the LWRES dissector in Wireshark 0.9.15 through 1.0.10 and 1.2.0 through 1.2.5 allow remote attackers to cause 52Plan
- CVE-2014-2299Buffer overflow in the mpeg_read function in wiretap/mpeg.c in the MPEG parser in Wireshark 1.8.x before 1.8.13 and 1.10.x before 1.10.6 all51Plan
- CVE-2011-1591Stack-based buffer overflow in the DECT dissector in epan/dissectors/packet-dect.c in Wireshark 1.4.x before 1.4.5 allows remote attackers t50Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-26420Dec 11, 2020 · Memory leak in RTPS protocol dissector in Wireshark 3.4.0 and 3.2.0 to 3.2.8 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted captur22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-26421Dec 11, 2020 · Crash in USB HID protocol dissector and possibly other dissectors in Wireshark 3.4.0 and 3.2.0 to 3.2.8 allows denial of service via packet 22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-22173Feb 17, 2021 · Memory leak in USB HID dissector in Wireshark 3.4.0 to 3.4.2 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse:sbc | 1.3-3.2.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:wireshark | 3.4.5-lp152.2.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libqt5-qtmultimedia | 5.9.7-7.2.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libvirt | 4.0.0-9.37.21 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:sbc | 1.3-3.2.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:wireshark | 3.4.5-3.53.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-21-0331 · Apr 21, 2021(Oracle Güvenlik Uyarısı Yayınladı)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
nvd-primary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.