CVE-2020-25709: A flaw was found in OpenLDAP.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 89% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openldap (Alpine:v3.10) 2.4.48-r2; openldap (Alpine:v3.11) 2.4.48-r3; openldap (Alpine:v3.12) 2.4.50-r1.
- Mentioned 3 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openldap (Alpine:v3.10) 2.4.48-r2; openldap (Alpine:v3.11) 2.4.48-r3; openldap (Alpine:v3.12) 2.4.50-r1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in OpenLDAP. This flaw allows an attacker who can send a malicious packet to be processed by OpenLDAP’s slapd server, to trigger an assertion failure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
- Published
- May 18, 2021
- Updated
- Oct 14, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.4% · 89th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-617
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openldap | openldap | cpe:2.3:a:openldap:openldap |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| apple | mac os x | cpe:2.3:o:apple:mac_os_x |
| apple | macos | cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos |
| redhat | jboss core services | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_core_services |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apple mac os x10.14.0 and later · before 10.14.6
- apple mac os x10.15 and later · before 10.15.7
- apple mac os x10.14.6
- apple mac os x10.15.7
- apple macos11.0 and later · before 11.0.1
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- openldap openldapbefore 2.4.56
- redhat jboss core servicesall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a OpenLDAP
- openldap 2.4.56affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | openldap | before 2.4.48-r2 | 2.4.48-r2 |
| Alpine:v3.11 | openldap | before 2.4.48-r3 | 2.4.48-r3 |
| Alpine:v3.12 | openldap | before 2.4.50-r1 | 2.4.50-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.13 | openldap | before 2.4.56-r0 | 2.4.56-r0 |
| Debian:10 | openldap | before 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u4 | 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u4 |
| Debian:12 | openldap | before 2.4.56+dfsg-1 | 2.4.56+dfsg-1 |
| Debian:9 | openldap | before 2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u6 | 2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u6 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | openldap2 | before 2.4.46-lp151.10.24.1 | 2.4.46-lp151.10.24.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | openldap2 | before 2.4.46-lp152.14.15.1 | 2.4.46-lp152.14.15.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap | before 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-clients | before 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-debuginfo | before 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-devel | before 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-servers | before 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-servers-sql | before 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | openldap2 | before 2.4.46-9.45.1 | 2.4.46-9.45.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 12 | openldap2 | before 2.4.41-18.24.26.1 | 2.4.41-18.24.26.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | openldap2-client-openssl1 | before 2.4.26-0.74.19.1 | 2.4.26-0.74.19.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | openldap2 | before 2.4.41-18.80.1 | 2.4.41-18.80.1 |
Same product
openldap: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-29155In OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.5.12 and 2.6.x before 2.6.2, a SQL injection vulnerability exists in the experimental back-sql backend to slapd, vi58Plan
- CVE-2020-36228An integer underflow was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to a slapd crash in the Certificate List Exact Assertion processing, r55Plan
- CVE-2020-36221An integer underflow was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to slapd crashes in the Certificate Exact Assertion processing, result55Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-36230Jan 26, 2021 · A flaw was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading in an assertion failure in slapd in the X.509 DN parsing in decode.c ber_next_elemen34Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-27212Feb 14, 2021 · In OpenLDAP through 2.4.57 and 2.5.x through 2.5.1alpha, an assertion failure in slapd can occur in the issuerAndThisUpdateCheck function vi50Plan
- Later →CVE-2020-25710May 28, 2021 · A flaw was found in OpenLDAP in versions before 2.4.56.31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:openldap | 2.4.48-r2 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openldap | 2.4.56+dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openldap2 | 2.4.46-lp151.10.24.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-clients | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-debuginfo | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-devel | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-servers | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-servers-sql | 0:2.4.44-25.el7_9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openldap2 | 2.4.41-18.80.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openldap2-client-openssl1 | 2.4.26-0.74.19.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0247 · Mar 24, 2022(RedHat Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
- TR-22-0222 · Mar 15, 2022(RedHat Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
- TR-22-0167 · Feb 23, 2022(RedHat Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-617 · Reachable AssertionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899675
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00008.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210716-0003/
- support.apple.com/kb/HT212147
- www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4792
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.