CVE-2020-15157: containerd can be coerced into leaking credentials during image pull
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 83.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: docker.io (Debian:10) 18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3; containerd (Debian:12) 1.3.2~ds1-2; docker.io (Debian:12) 19.03.13+dfsg2-1.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to docker.io (Debian:10) 18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3; containerd (Debian:12) 1.3.2~ds1-2; docker.io (Debian:12) 19.03.13+dfsg2-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In containerd (an industry-standard container runtime) before version 1.2.14 there is a credential leaking vulnerability. If a container image manifest in the OCI Image format or Docker Image V2 Schema 2 format includes a URL for the location of a specific image layer (otherwise known as a “foreign layer”), the default containerd resolver will follow that URL to attempt to download it. In v1.2.x but not 1.3.0 or later, the default containerd resolver will provide its authentication credentials if the server where the URL is located presents an HTTP 401 status code along with registry-specific HTTP headers. If an attacker publishes a public image with a manifest that directs one of the layers to be fetched from a web server they control and they trick a user or system into pulling the image, they can obtain the credentials used for pulling that image. In some cases, this may be the user's username and password for the registry. In other cases, this may be the credentials attached to the cloud virtual instance which can grant access to other cloud resources in the account. The default containerd resolver is used by the cri-containerd plugin (which can be used by Kubernetes), the ctr development tool, and other client programs that have explicitly linked against it. This vulnerability has been fixed in containerd 1.2.14. containerd 1.3 and later are not affected. If you are using containerd 1.3 or later, you are not affected. If you are using cri-containerd in the 1.2 series or prior, you should ensure you only pull images from trusted sources. Other container runtimes built on top of containerd but not using the default resolver (such as Docker) are not affected.
- Published
- Oct 16, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.2% · 83th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-522
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.2%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.1
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.1
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linuxfoundation | containerd | cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:containerd |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
Using containerd? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Docker)
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux20.04
- debian debian linux10.0
- linuxfoundation containerd1.2.0 and later · before 1.2.14
- linuxfoundation containerd1.3.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
containerd containerd
- < 1.2.14affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | docker.io | before 18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3 | 18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3 |
| Debian:12 | containerd | before 1.3.2~ds1-2 | 1.3.2~ds1-2 |
| Debian:12 | docker.io | before 19.03.13+dfsg2-1 | 19.03.13+dfsg2-1 |
| Go | github.com/containerd/containerd | before 1.2.14 | 1.2.14 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | conmon | before 2.0.30-150300.8.3.1 | 2.0.30-150300.8.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | libcontainers-common | before 20210626-150300.8.3.1 | 20210626-150300.8.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | libseccomp | before 2.5.3-150300.10.5.1 | 2.5.3-150300.10.5.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | podman | before 3.4.4-150300.9.3.2 | 3.4.4-150300.9.3.2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | containerd | before 1.4.8-2.2 | 1.4.8-2.2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | libcontainers-common | before 20210626-7.1 | 20210626-7.1 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | cri-o | before 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el7.51 | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el7.51 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | cri-o-debuginfo | before 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el7.51 | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el7.51 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | cri-tools | before 0:1.18.0-3.el7 | 0:1.18.0-3.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | cri-tools-debuginfo | before 0:1.18.0-3.el7 | 0:1.18.0-3.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | openshift | before 0:4.7.0-202102060108.p0.git.97095.7271b90.el7 | 0:4.7.0-202102060108.p0.git.97095.7271b90.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | openshift-hyperkube | before 0:4.7.0-202102060108.p0.git.97095.7271b90.el7 | 0:4.7.0-202102060108.p0.git.97095.7271b90.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | cri-o | before 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el8.51 | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el8.51 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | cri-o-debuginfo | before 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el8.51 | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el8.51 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | cri-o-debugsource | before 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el8.51 | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el8.51 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | cri-tools | before 0:1.20.0-1.el8 | 0:1.20.0-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | cri-tools-debuginfo | before 0:1.20.0-1.el8 | 0:1.20.0-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | cri-tools-debugsource | before 0:1.20.0-1.el8 | 0:1.20.0-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | ignition | before 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | ignition-debuginfo | before 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 |
+16
Same product
linuxfoundation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-23648Insecure handling of image volumes in containerd CRI plugin38Monitor
- CVE-2026-53488containerd CRI plugin: — image-config `LABEL` flows to restart-monitor `binary://` logger: host-root command execution from an image pull37Monitor
- CVE-2021-43816Improper Preservation of Permissions in containerd37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2020-15257Nov 30, 2020 · containerd-shim API Exposed to Host Network Containers21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-21334Mar 10, 2021 · environment variable leak26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-32760Jul 19, 2021 · Archive package allows chmod of file outside of unpack target directory25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:containerd | 1.3.2~ds1-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:docker.io | 19.03.13+dfsg2-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/containerd/containerd | 1.2.14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:conmon | 2.0.30-150300.8.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:containerd | 1.4.8-2.2 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:libcontainers-common | 20210626-150300.8.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:libseccomp | 2.5.3-150300.10.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:podman | 3.4.4-150300.9.3.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cri-o | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el7.51 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cri-o-debuginfo | 0:1.20.0-0.rhaos4.7.git8921e00.el7.51 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cri-tools | 0:1.18.0-3.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ignition | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ignition-debuginfo | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ignition-debugsource | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ignition-validate | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ignition-validate-debuginfo | 0:2.9.0-2.rhaos4.7.git1d56dc8.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift | 0:4.7.0-202102060108.p0.git.97095.7271b90.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-hyperkube | 0:4.7.0-202102060108.p0.git.97095.7271b90.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-rsa | 0:4.7-1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-rsa | 0:4.7-1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.7::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:conmon | 2.0.30-150300.8.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:containerd | 1.3.9-16.35.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:docker | 19.03.15_ce-98.60.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:docker-runc | 1.0.0rc10+gitr3981_dc9208a3303f-1.52.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:golang-github-docker-libnetwork | 0.7.0.1+gitr2908_55e924b8a842-37.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libcontainers-common | 20210626-150300.8.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libseccomp | 2.5.3-150300.10.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:podman | 3.4.4-150300.9.3.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-20-945 · Nov 11, 2020(Docker Sunucu Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-522 · Insufficiently Protected CredentialsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Session SidejackingCAPEC-102likelihood: High · High
- Signature Spoofing by Key TheftCAPEC-474likelihood: Medium · High
- Password Recovery ExploitationCAPEC-50likelihood: Medium · High
- KerberoastingCAPEC-509High
- Modify Existing ServiceCAPEC-551
- Remote Services with Stolen CredentialsCAPEC-555Very High
- Use of Known Domain CredentialsCAPEC-560likelihood: High · High
- Windows Admin Shares with Stolen CredentialsCAPEC-561
ATT&CK techniques
- Remote ServicesT1021
- Remote Services:SMB/Windows Admin SharesT1021.002
- Valid AccountsT1078
- Brute Force:Credential StuffingT1110.004
- Email Collection:Remote Email CollectionT1114.002
- External Remote ServicesT1133
- Create or Modify System ProcessT1543
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Pass The HashT1550.002
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Pass The TicketT1550.003
- Unsecured Credentials: Private KeysT1552.004
- Steal or Forge Kerberos TicketsT1558
- Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets:KerberoastingT1558.003
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.