CVE-2020-14387: A flaw was found in rsync in versions since 3.2.0pre1.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 66.2% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: rsync (Alpine:v3.13) 3.2.4-r0; rsync (Debian:12) 3.2.3-3; rsync (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.2.3-2.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to rsync (Alpine:v3.13) 3.2.4-r0; rsync (Debian:12) 3.2.3-3; rsync (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.2.3-2.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in rsync in versions since 3.2.0pre1. Rsync improperly validates certificate with host mismatch vulnerability. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit the flaw by performing a man-in-the-middle attack using a valid certificate for another hostname which could compromise confidentiality and integrity of data transmitted using rsync-ssl. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. This flaw affects rsync versions before 3.2.4.
- Published
- May 27, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.1% · 66th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-297
Report tools
Action score
29
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 29 / 40 · 7.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your site's encryptionRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| samba | rsync | cpe:2.3:a:samba:rsync |
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a rsync
- rsync 3.2.4affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- samba rsync3.2.1 and later · before 3.2.4
- samba rsync3.2.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.13 | rsync | from 3.2.1 · before 3.2.4-r0 | 3.2.4-r0 |
| Debian:12 | rsync | before 3.2.3-3 | 3.2.3-3 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | rsync | before 3.2.3-2.6 | 3.2.3-2.6 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | rsync | before 3.2.3-150000.4.23.2 | 3.2.3-150000.4.23.2 |
Same product
samba: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-12084Rsync: heap buffer overflow in rsync due to improper checksum length handling61This week
- CVE-2017-16548The receive_xattr function in xattrs.c in rsync 3.1.2 and 3.1.3-development does not check for a trailing '\0' character in an xattr name…41Plan
- CVE-2017-17434The daemon in rsync 3.1.2, and 3.1.3-development before 2017-12-03, does not check for fnamecmp filenames in the daemon_filter_list data…40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-15994Oct 29, 2017 · rsync 3.1.3-development before 2017-10-24 mishandles archaic checksums, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended…39Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-5764Jan 17, 2018 · The parse_arguments function in options.c in rsyncd in rsync before 3.1.3 does not prevent multiple --protect-args uses, which allows…32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-29154Aug 2, 2022 · An issue was discovered in rsync before 3.2.5 that allows malicious remote servers to write arbitrary files inside the directories of…30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:rsync | 3.2.4-r0 · Alpine:v3.13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:rsync | 3.2.3-3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rsync | 3.2.3-2.6 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rsync | 3.2.3-150000.4.23.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-297 · Improper Validation of Certificate with Host MismatchCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.