CVE-2020-12966: AMD EPYC™ Processors contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Secure Encrypted Virtualization with Encrypted State (SEV-ES) an
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.31% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
AMD EPYC™ Processors contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Secure Encrypted Virtualization with Encrypted State (SEV-ES) and Secure Encrypted Virtualization with Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP). A local authenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to leaking guest data by the malicious hypervisor.
- Published
- Feb 4, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 24th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-200
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| amd | epyc 7763 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7763_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7763 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7763 |
| amd | epyc 7713p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7713p_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7713p | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7713p |
| amd | epyc 7713 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7713_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7713 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7713 |
| amd | epyc 7663 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7663_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7663 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7663 |
| amd | epyc 7643 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7643_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7643 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7643 |
| amd | epyc 75f3 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_75f3_firmware |
| amd | epyc 75f3 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_75f3 |
and 188 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- amd epyc 7001 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7002 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7003 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.5
- amd epyc 7232p firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7251 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7252 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7261 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7262 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7272 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7281 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7282 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 72f3 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.5
- amd epyc 7301 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7302 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7302p firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7313 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.5
- amd epyc 7313p firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.5
- amd epyc 7343 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.5
- amd epyc 7351 firmwareall versions
- amd epyc 7351p firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (AMD). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
AMD 1st/2nd/3rd Gen AMD EPYC™ Processors
- unspecified and later · before undefinedaffected
Same product
amd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-46771Insufficient validation of addresses in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) firmware system call may potentially lead to arbitrary code execution by 31Monitor
- CVE-2021-26353Failure to validate inputs in SMM may allow an attacker to create a mishandled error leaving the DRTM UApp in a partially initialized state 31Monitor
- CVE-2021-26324A bug with the SEV-ES TMR may lead to a potential loss of memory integrity for SNP-active VMs.31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2021-26332May 10, 2022 · Failure to verify SEV-ES TMR is not in MMIO space, SEV-ES FW could result in a potential loss of integrity or availability.28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-26370May 10, 2022 · Improper validation of destination address in SVC_LOAD_FW_IMAGE_BY_INSTANCE and SVC_LOAD_BINARY_BY_ATTRIB in a malicious UApp or ABL may all28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-26339May 11, 2022 · A bug in AMD CPU’s core logic may allow for an attacker, using specific code from an unprivileged VM, to trigger a CPU core hang resulting i22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-200 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
{
"permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],
"background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }
}Fixed
{
"permissions": ["activeTab"],
"host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ExcavationCAPEC-116likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- FootprintingCAPEC-169likelihood: High · Very Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- FingerprintingCAPEC-224likelihood: High · Very Low
- ICMP Echo Request PingCAPEC-285likelihood: Medium · Low
- TCP SYN ScanCAPEC-287Low
- Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) RecordsCAPEC-290Low
ATT&CK techniques
- System Service DiscoveryT1007
- System Network Configuration DiscoveryT1016
- Remote System DiscoveryT1018
- System Owner/User DiscoveryT1033
- Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005
- Network Service ScanningT1046
- System Network Connections DiscoveryT1049
- Process DiscoveryT1057
- Permission Groups DiscoveryT1069
- System Information DiscoveryT1082
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Account DiscoveryT1087
- Multi-Factor Authentication InterceptionT1111
- Peripheral Device DiscoveryT1120
- System Time DiscoveryT1124
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.