CVE-2020-12243: In filter.c in slapd in OpenLDAP before 2.4.50, LDAP search filters with nested boolean expressions can result in denial of service (daemon
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 91.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openldap (Alpine:v3.10) 2.4.48-r1; openldap (Alpine:v3.11) 2.4.48-r2; openldap (Alpine:v3.12) 2.4.50-r0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openldap (Alpine:v3.10) 2.4.48-r1; openldap (Alpine:v3.11) 2.4.48-r2; openldap (Alpine:v3.12) 2.4.50-r0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In filter.c in slapd in OpenLDAP before 2.4.50, LDAP search filters with nested boolean expressions can result in denial of service (daemon crash).
- Published
- Apr 28, 2020
- Updated
- Oct 14, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.7% · 91th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-674
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.7%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openldap | openldap | cpe:2.3:a:openldap:openldap |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| netapp | cloud backup | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:cloud_backup |
| netapp | steelstore cloud integrated storage | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:steelstore_cloud_integrated_storage |
| netapp | h410c firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h410c_firmware |
| netapp | h410c | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h410c |
| netapp | h300s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300s_firmware |
| netapp | h300s | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300s |
| netapp | h500s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500s_firmware |
| netapp | h500s | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500s |
and 14 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apple mac os x10.13.0 and later · before 10.13.6
- apple mac os x10.15 and later · before 10.15.6
- apple mac os x10.14.0 and later · before 10.14.6
- apple mac os x10.13.6
- apple mac os x10.14.6
- broadcom brocade fabric operating systemall versions
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux19.10
- canonical ubuntu linux20.04
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux8.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- netapp cloud backupall versions
- netapp h300e firmwareall versions
- netapp h300s firmwareall versions
- netapp h410c firmwareall versions
- netapp h410s firmwareall versions
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | openldap | before 2.4.48-r1 | 2.4.48-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.11 | openldap | before 2.4.48-r2 | 2.4.48-r2 |
| Alpine:v3.12 | openldap | before 2.4.50-r0 | 2.4.50-r0 |
| Debian:10 | openldap | before 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u2 | 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u2 |
| Debian:12 | openldap | before 2.4.50+dfsg-1 | 2.4.50+dfsg-1 |
| Debian:8 | openldap | before 2.4.40+dfsg-1+deb8u6 | 2.4.40+dfsg-1+deb8u6 |
| Debian:9 | openldap | before 2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u4 | 2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u4 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | openldap2 | before 2.4.46-lp151.10.9.1 | 2.4.46-lp151.10.9.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap | before 0:2.4.44-22.el7 | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-clients | before 0:2.4.44-22.el7 | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-debuginfo | before 0:2.4.44-22.el7 | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-devel | before 0:2.4.44-22.el7 | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-servers | before 0:2.4.44-22.el7 | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openldap-servers-sql | before 0:2.4.44-22.el7 | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | openldap2 | before 2.4.41-18.68.1 | 2.4.41-18.68.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP1 | openldap2 | before 2.4.46-9.28.2 | 2.4.46-9.28.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 12 | openldap2 | before 2.4.41-18.24.17.1 | 2.4.41-18.24.17.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 | openldap2 | before 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 | 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 | openldap2-client | before 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 | 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | openldap2-client-openssl1 | before 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 | 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP1 | openldap2-client | before 2.4.41-18.24.17.1 | 2.4.41-18.24.17.1 |
Same product
openldap: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-29155In OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.5.12 and 2.6.x before 2.6.2, a SQL injection vulnerability exists in the experimental back-sql backend to slapd, vi58Plan
- CVE-2020-36228An integer underflow was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to a slapd crash in the Certificate List Exact Assertion processing, r55Plan
- CVE-2020-36221An integer underflow was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to slapd crashes in the Certificate Exact Assertion processing, result55Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-13565Jul 26, 2019 · An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48.32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-8182Jan 2, 2020 · An off-by-one error leading to a crash was discovered in openldap 2.4 when processing DNS SRV messages.31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-15719Jul 14, 2020 · libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:openldap | 2.4.48-r1 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openldap | 2.4.50+dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openldap2 | 2.4.46-lp151.10.9.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-clients | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-debuginfo | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-devel | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-servers | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openldap-servers-sql | 0:2.4.44-22.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openldap2 | 2.4.41-18.68.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openldap2-client | 2.4.41-18.24.17.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openldap2-client-openssl1 | 2.4.26-0.74.9.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-674 · Uncontrolled RecursionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (11 more)Show less
- git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4/CHANGES
- git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/commit/98464c11df8247d6a11b52e294ba5dd4f0380440
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00001.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200511-0003/
- support.apple.com/kb/HT211289
- usn.ubuntu.com/4352-1/
- usn.ubuntu.com/4352-2/
- www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4666
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.