CVE-2020-10778: In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fi
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.87% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 59% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: cfme (Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7) 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf; cfme-appliance (Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7) 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf; cfme-appliance-common (Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7) 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to cfme (Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7) 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf; cfme-appliance (Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7) 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf; cfme-appliance-common (Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7) 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fields since there is no server-side validation. This business logic flaw violate the expected behavior.
- Published
- Aug 11, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 59th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-669
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | cloudforms | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:cloudforms |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat cloudforms4.7
- redhat cloudforms5.0.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a CloudForms
- 4.7 and 5affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-appliance | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-appliance-common | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-appliance-debuginfo | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-appliance-tools | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-debuginfo | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-gemset | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | cfme-gemset-debuginfo | before 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.11::el8 | cfme | before 0:5.11.7.3-1.el8cf | 0:5.11.7.3-1.el8cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.11::el8 | cfme-gemset | before 0:5.11.7.3-1.el8cf | 0:5.11.7.3-1.el8cf |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-3760There is an information leak vulnerability in Sprockets.38Monitor
- CVE-2016-5402A code injection flaw was found in the way capacity and utilization imported control files are processed.37Monitor
- CVE-2020-14325Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0 was vulnerable to the User Impersonation authorization flaw which allows malicious attacker to create exi36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-0197Dec 13, 2019 · CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-10777Aug 11, 2020 · A cross-site scripting flaw was found in Report Menu feature of Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5.21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-10779Aug 11, 2020 · Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 leads to insecure direct object references (IDOR) and functional level access control bypass due to missing pri26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:cfme | 0:5.11.7.3-1.el8cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance-common | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance-debuginfo | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance-tools | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-debuginfo | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-gemset | 0:5.11.7.3-1.el8cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.11::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-gemset-debuginfo | 0:5.10.16.0-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-669 · Incorrect Resource Transfer Between SpheresCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.