An invalid authentication sequence could result in the hostapd process terminating due to missing state validation steps
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4.6% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 91.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: hostapd (Alpine:v3.10) 2.8-r0; hostapd (Alpine:v3.6) 2.6-r3; hostapd (Alpine:v3.7) 2.6-r5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to hostapd (Alpine:v3.10) 2.8-r0; hostapd (Alpine:v3.6) 2.6-r3; hostapd (Alpine:v3.7) 2.6-r5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An invalid authentication sequence could result in the hostapd process terminating due to missing state validation steps when processing the SAE confirm message when in hostapd/AP mode. All version of hostapd with SAE support are vulnerable. An attacker may force the hostapd process to terminate, performing a denial of service attack. Both hostapd with SAE support and wpa_supplicant with SAE support prior to and including version 2.7 are affected.
- Published
- Apr 17, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.6% · 91th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-642
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.6%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| w1.fi | hostapd | cpe:2.3:a:w1.fi:hostapd |
| w1.fi | wpa supplicant | cpe:2.3:a:w1.fi:wpa_supplicant |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora28
- fedoraproject fedora29
- fedoraproject fedora30
- w1.fi hostapdup to 2.7 inclusive
- w1.fi wpa supplicantup to 2.7 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (certcc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Wi-Fi Alliance hostapd with SAE support
- 2.7 and later · up to and including 2.7affected
Wi-Fi Alliance wpa_supplicant with SAE support
- 2.7 and later · up to and including 2.7affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | hostapd | before 2.8-r0 | 2.8-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.6 | hostapd | before 2.6-r3 | 2.6-r3 |
| Alpine:v3.7 | hostapd | before 2.6-r5 | 2.6-r5 |
| Alpine:v3.8 | hostapd | before 2.6-r6 | 2.6-r6 |
| Alpine:v3.9 | hostapd | before 2.7-r3 | 2.7-r3 |
| Debian:12 | wpa | before 2:2.7+git20190128+0c1e29f-4 | 2:2.7+git20190128+0c1e29f-4 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | hostapd | before 2.9-6.2 | 2.9-6.2 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 | hostapd | before 2.9-bp151.5.3.1 | 2.9-bp151.5.3.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 | hostapd | before 2.9-bp151.5.3.1 | 2.9-bp151.5.3.1 |
Same product
w1.fi: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-23304The implementations of EAP-pwd in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of c40Plan
- CVE-2022-23303The implementations of SAE in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side channel attacks as a result of cache40Plan
- CVE-2019-9499The implementations of EAP-PWD in wpa_supplicant EAP Peer do not validate the scalar and element values in EAP-pwd-Commit33Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-9494Apr 17, 2019 · The implementations of SAE in hostapd and wpa_supplicant are vulnerable to side-channel attacks24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-9495Apr 17, 2019 · The implementations of EAP-PWD in hostapd and wpa_supplicant are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns15Monitor
- Later →CVE-2019-9497Apr 17, 2019 · The implementations of EAP-PWD in hostapd EAP Server and wpa_supplicant EAP Peer do not validate the scalar and element values in EAP-pwd-Commit33Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:hostapd | 2.8-r0 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:wpa | 2:2.7+git20190128+0c1e29f-4 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:hostapd | 2.9-bp151.5.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:hostapd | 2.9-bp151.5.3.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-642 · External Control of Critical State DataCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/152914/FreeBSD-Security-Advisory-FreeBSD-SA-19-03.wpa.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/56OBBOJJSKRTDGEXZOVFSTP4HDSDBLAE/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SVMJOFEYBGXZLFF5IOLW67SSOPKFEJP3/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TDOZGR3T7FVO5JSZWK2QPR7AOFIEJTIZ/
- seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/40
- security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-19:03.wpa.asc
- w1.fi/security/2019-3/
- www.synology.com/security/advisory/Synology_SA_19_16
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.