An issue was discovered in 3S-Smart CODESYS V3 products.
An issue was discovered in 3S-Smart CODESYS V3 products. The application may utilize non-TLS based encryption, which results in user credentials being insufficiently protected during transport. All variants of the following CODESYS V3 products in all versions containing the CmpUserMgr component are affected regardless of the CPU type or operating system: CODESYS Control for BeagleBone, CODESYS Control for emPC-A/iMX6, CODESYS Control for IOT2000, CODESYS Control for Linux, CODESYS Control for PFC100, CODESYS Control for PFC200, CODESYS Control for Raspberry Pi, CODESYS Control RTE V3, CODESYS Control RTE V3 (for Beckhoff CX), CODESYS Control Win V3 (also part of the CODESYS Development System setup), CODESYS V3 Simulation Runtime (part of the CODESYS Development System), CODESYS Control V3 Runtime System Toolkit, CODESYS HMI V3.
- Published
- Aug 15, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 19th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-327
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| codesys | control for beaglebone sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_beaglebone_sl |
| codesys | control for empc-a\/imx6 sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_empc-a\/imx6_sl |
| codesys | control for iot2000 sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_iot2000_sl |
| codesys | control for linux sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_linux_sl |
| codesys | control for pfc100 sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_pfc100_sl |
| codesys | control for pfc200 sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_pfc200_sl |
| codesys | control rte sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_rte_sl |
| codesys | control win sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_win_sl |
| codesys | development system | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:development_system |
| codesys | hmi sl | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:hmi_sl |
| codesys | raspberry pi | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:raspberry_pi |
| codesys | runtime toolkit | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:runtime_toolkit |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- codesys control for beaglebone sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control for empc-a/imx6 sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control for iot2000 sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control for linux sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control for pfc100 sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control for pfc200 sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control rte sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys control win sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys development system3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys hmi sl3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys raspberry pi3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
- codesys runtime toolkit3.0 and later · before 3.5.16.0
Same product
codesys: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-9010An issue was discovered in 3S-Smart CODESYS V3 products.40Plan
- CVE-2018-10612In 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH CODESYS Control V3 products prior to version 3.5.14.0, user access management and communication encrypti39Monitor
- CVE-2022-47379CODESYS: Multiple products prone to out-of-bounds write36Monitor
- CVE-2023-6357OS Command Injection in multiple CODESYS products35Monitor
- CVE-2022-4046CODESYS: Improper memory restrictions fro CODESYS Control35Monitor
- CVE-2022-47390CODESYS: Multiple products prone to stack based out-of-bounds write35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-327 · Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic AlgorithmCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Encryption Brute ForcingCAPEC-20likelihood: Low · Low
- Creating a Rogue Certification Authority CertificateCAPEC-459likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Signature SpoofCAPEC-473
- Signature Spoofing by Improper ValidationCAPEC-475likelihood: Low · High
- Cryptanalysis of Cellular EncryptionCAPEC-608High
- Rooting SIM CardsCAPEC-614High
- CryptanalysisCAPEC-97likelihood: Low · Very High
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- customers.codesys.com/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=12943&token=d097958a67ba382de688916f77e3013c0802fade&download=
- www.us-cert.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-19-213-04
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.