CVE-2019-3811: A vulnerability was found in sssd.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.69% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 53% of all records.
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: sssd (Debian:10) 1.16.3-3.2+deb10u1; sssd (Debian:12) 2.2.0-1; sssd (Debian:8) 1.11.7-3+deb8u2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to sssd (Debian:10) 1.16.3-3.2+deb10u1; sssd (Debian:12) 2.2.0-1; sssd (Debian:8) 1.11.7-3+deb8u2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability was found in sssd. If a user was configured with no home directory set, sssd would return '/' (the root directory) instead of '' (the empty string / no home directory). This could impact services that restrict the user's filesystem access to within their home directory through chroot() etc. All versions before 2.1 are vulnerable.
- Published
- Jan 15, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 53th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-200
Report tools
Action score
20
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.2
- CNA · redhat
- 4.1
- 1.1 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| fedoraproject | sssd | cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:sssd |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux8.0
- fedoraproject fedoraall versions
- fedoraproject sssdbefore 2.1
- opensuse leap15.0
- opensuse leap42.3
- redhat enterprise linux7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The sssd Project sssd
- 2.1affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | sssd | before 1.16.3-3.2+deb10u1 | 1.16.3-3.2+deb10u1 |
| Debian:12 | sssd | before 2.2.0-1 | 2.2.0-1 |
| Debian:8 | sssd | before 1.11.7-3+deb8u2 | 1.11.7-3+deb8u2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | adcli | before 0.8.2-lp150.4.1 | 0.8.2-lp150.4.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | sssd | before 1.16.1-lp150.2.9.1 | 1.16.1-lp150.2.9.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | sssd | before 2.9.3-2.1 | 2.9.3-2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libipa_hbac | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libipa_hbac-devel | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_autofs | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_certmap | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_certmap-devel | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_idmap | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_idmap-devel | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_nss_idmap | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_nss_idmap-devel | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_simpleifp | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_simpleifp-devel | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | libsss_sudo | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-libipa_hbac | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-libsss_nss_idmap | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-sss | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-sss-murmur | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-sssdconfig | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | sssd | before 0:1.16.4-21.el7 | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 |
+22
Same product
fedoraproject: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-3621A flaw was found in SSSD, where the sssctl command was vulnerable to shell command injection via the logs-fetch and cache-expire subcommands36Monitor
- CVE-2022-4254sssd: libsss_certmap fails to sanitise certificate data used in LDAP filters35Monitor
- CVE-2012-3462A flaw was found in SSSD version 1.9.0.35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-5292Oct 29, 2015 · Memory leak in the Privilege Attribute Certificate (PAC) responder plugin (sssd_pac_plugin.so) in System Security Services Daemon (SSSD) 1.128Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-16883Dec 19, 2018 · sssd versions from 1.13.0 to before 2.0.0 did not properly restrict access to the infopipe according to the "allowed_uids" configuration par22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2018-16838Mar 25, 2019 · A flaw was found in sssd Group Policy Objects implementation.21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:sssd | 2.2.0-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:adcli | 0.8.2-lp150.4.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:sssd | 1.16.1-lp150.2.9.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libipa_hbac | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsss_autofs | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsss_certmap | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsss_idmap | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsss_nss_idmap | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsss_simpleifp | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libsss_sudo | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-libipa_hbac | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-sss | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-sss-murmur | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python-sssdconfig | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:sssd | 0:1.16.4-21.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:adcli | 0.8.2-1.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:sssd | 1.16.1-3.15.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-200 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
{
"permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],
"background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }
}Fixed
{
"permissions": ["activeTab"],
"host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ExcavationCAPEC-116likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- FootprintingCAPEC-169likelihood: High · Very Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- FingerprintingCAPEC-224likelihood: High · Very Low
- ICMP Echo Request PingCAPEC-285likelihood: Medium · Low
- TCP SYN ScanCAPEC-287Low
- Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) RecordsCAPEC-290Low
ATT&CK techniques
- System Service DiscoveryT1007
- System Network Configuration DiscoveryT1016
- Remote System DiscoveryT1018
- System Owner/User DiscoveryT1033
- Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005
- Network Service ScanningT1046
- System Network Connections DiscoveryT1049
- Process DiscoveryT1057
- Permission Groups DiscoveryT1069
- System Information DiscoveryT1082
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Account DiscoveryT1087
- Multi-Factor Authentication InterceptionT1111
- Peripheral Device DiscoveryT1120
- System Time DiscoveryT1124
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00045.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/106644
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2177
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3811
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00011.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00028.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.