NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

CVE-2019-19897: In IXP EasyInstall 6.2.13723, there is Remote Code Execution via the Agent Service.

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 41/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 5.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 92.8% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In IXP EasyInstall 6.2.13723, there is Remote Code Execution via the Agent Service. An unauthenticated attacker can communicate with the Agent Service over TCP port 20051, and execute code in the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM context of the target system by using the Execute Command Line function.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

Published: Jan 23, 2020
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
EPSS: 5.5% · 92th percentile
CWE: CWE-78

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS: 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 2 / 30 · 5.5%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: 9.8
CNA · mitre: 10.0; 0.2 point gap

CVSS:3.0/AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:N/S:C/UI:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
ixpdata	easyinstall	cpe:2.3:a:ixpdata:easyinstall

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

ixpdata easyinstall6.2.13723

Same product

ixpdata: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2019-19896In IXP EasyInstall 6.2.13723, there is Remote Code Execution via weak permissions on the Engine Service share.
40Plan
CVE-2023-30131An issue discovered in IXP EasyInstall 6.6.14884.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary commands, gain escalated privilege, and cause other uns
39Monitor
CVE-2022-35120IXPdata EasyInstall 6.6.14725 contains an access control issue.
35Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2019-19894Jan 23, 2020 · In IXP EasyInstall 6.2.13723, it is possible to temporarily disable UAC by using the Agent Service on a client system.
22Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2019-19895Jan 23, 2020 · In IXP EasyInstall 6.2.13723, there is Lateral Movement (using the Agent Service) against other users on a client system.
31Monitor
Later →CVE-2019-19898Jan 23, 2020 · In IXP EasyInstall 6.2.13723, there are cleartext credentials in network communication on TCP port 20050 when using the Administrator consol
30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
No account or password is required.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: high · data can be read
Integrity: high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability: high · the service can be disrupted

Attack vector: Network
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: None
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: High
Integrity impact: High
Availability impact: High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-78 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

1const host = req.body.host;
2exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

Fixed

1const host = req.body.host;
2if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
3execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

All records