CVE-2019-1912: Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 41/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 17% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files. The vulnerability is due to incomplete authorization checks in the web management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to certain parts of the web management interface. Depending on the configuration of the affected switch, the malicious request must be sent via HTTP or HTTPS. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify the configuration of an affected device or to inject a reverse shell. This vulnerability affects Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches running firmware versions prior to 1.1.4.4 with the web management interface enabled. The web management interface is enabled via both HTTP and HTTPS by default.
- Published
- Aug 7, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 17.0% · 97th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-285
Report tools
Action score
41
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 5 / 30 · 17.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.1
- CNA · cisco
- 9.1
- agree
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | sf-220-24 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:sf-220-24_firmware |
| cisco | sf-220-24 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:sf-220-24 |
| cisco | sf220-24p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:sf220-24p_firmware |
| cisco | sf220-24p | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:sf220-24p |
| cisco | sf220-48 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:sf220-48_firmware |
| cisco | sf220-48 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:sf220-48 |
| cisco | sf220-48p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:sf220-48p_firmware |
| cisco | sf220-48p | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:sf220-48p |
| cisco | sg220-26 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:sg220-26_firmware |
| cisco | sg220-26 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:sg220-26 |
| cisco | sg220-26p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:sg220-26p_firmware |
| cisco | sg220-26p | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:sg220-26p |
and 10 more
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cisco Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Plus Switches
- unspecified and later · before 1.1.4.4affected
Affected versions · NVD (11)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco sf-220-24 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sf220-24p firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sf220-48 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sf220-48p firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-26 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-26p firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-28 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-28mp firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-50 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-50p firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
- cisco sg220-52 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.4
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-1913Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities47Plan
- CVE-2019-1914Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches Command Injection Vulnerability35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2019-09-30 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+54 d
- TodayNov 14, 2026+2656 d
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-285 · Improper AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data TokensCAPEC-39likelihood: High · Medium
- Bypassing ATA Password SecurityCAPEC-402
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Data from Local SystemT1005
- Query RegistryT1012
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in RegistryT1552.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data ManipulationT1565.002
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
- Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.