Unsafe deserialization occurs within a Dubbo application which has HTTP remoting enabled.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 50/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 36.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: org.apache.dubbo:dubbo-rpc-http-invoker (Maven) 2.7.5.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to org.apache.dubbo:dubbo-rpc-http-invoker (Maven) 2.7.5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Unsafe deserialization occurs within a Dubbo application which has HTTP remoting enabled. An attacker may submit a POST request with a Java object in it to completely compromise a Provider instance of Apache Dubbo, if this instance enables HTTP. This issue affected Apache Dubbo 2.7.0 to 2.7.4, 2.6.0 to 2.6.7, and all 2.5.x versions.
- Published
- Apr 1, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 36.5% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-502
Report tools
Action score
50
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 11 / 30 · 36.5%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| apache | dubbo | cpe:2.3:a:apache:dubbo |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apache dubbo2.5.0 and later · up to 2.5.10 inclusive
- apache dubbo2.6.0 and later · up to 2.6.7 inclusive
- apache dubbo2.7.0 and later · up to 2.7.4 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (apache). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Apache Apache Dubbo
- 2.7.0 to 2.7.4, 2.6.0 to 2.6.7, all 2.5.x versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.apache.dubbo:dubbo-rpc-http-invoker | from 2.5.0 · before 2.7.5 | 2.7.5 |
Same product
apache: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-30181Apache Dubbo RCE on customers via Script route poisoning (Nashorn script injection)57Plan
- CVE-2021-30180Apache Dubbo RCE on customers via Condition route poisoning (Unsafe YAML unmarshaling)57Plan
- CVE-2021-25641Dubbo Zookeeper does not check serialization id45Plan
- CVE-2021-43297Dubbo Hessian cause RCE when parse error44Plan
- CVE-2020-1948This vulnerability can affect all Dubbo users stay on version 2.7.6 or lower.44Plan
- CVE-2023-29234Bypass serialize checks in Apache Dubbo41Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.apache.dubbo:dubbo-rpc-http-invoker | 2.7.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Nuclei detection template ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×7
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2019-17564 | — |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2020-02-12 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2020-02-13 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2020-02-14 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2020-02-17 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:16 | 2020-02-20 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:8 | 2020-02-24 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-10-08 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-50 d
- Published
- TodayOct 14, 2026+2387 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-502 · Deserialization of Untrusted DataCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Data received over the network is deserialized into the language’s native object format without verifying its source. Code paths inside the object can be triggered during deserialization.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-502 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
payload = sock.recv(65536)job = pickle.loads(payload)Fixed
payload = sock.recv(65536)if not hmac.compare_digest(sign(payload), header_sig): raise PermissionError("invalid signature")job = JobSchema.validate(json.loads(payload))Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.