In Webkul Bagisto before 0.1.5, the functionalities for customers to change their own values (such as address, review, orders, etc.) can als

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

• webkul bagistobefore 0.1.5

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

• CVE-2026-9506Path Traversal Vulnerability in Bagisto
  35Monitor
• CVE-2026-21448Bagisto has Normal & Blind SSTI from low-privilege user when ordering product
  35Monitor
• CVE-2026-21446Bagisto Missing Authentication on Installer API Endpoints
  35Monitor
• CVE-2023-36237Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Bagisto before v.1.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML script.
  35Monitor
• CVE-2023-33570Bagisto v1.5.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI).
  35Monitor
• CVE-2019-14933Bagisto 0.1.5 allows CSRF under /admin URIs.
  35Monitor

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Root cause

The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

1const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);2res.json(invoice);

1const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({2  id: req.params.id,3  ownerId: req.user.id,4});5if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);6res.json(invoice);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.