Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2019-1559· NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

0-byte record padding oracle

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 17.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: openssl (Alpine:v3.6) 1.0.2r-r0; openssl (Debian:12) 1.1.0b-2; openssl (Debian:8) 1.0.1t-1+deb8u11.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Alpine:v3.6) 1.0.2r-r0; openssl (Debian:12) 1.1.0b-2; openssl (Debian:8) 1.0.1t-1+deb8u11 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).

MediumCVSS 5.9 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 27, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
17.1% · 97th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
23 / 40 · 5.9 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
5 / 30 · 17.1%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2019-1559

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl
canonicalubuntu linux
debiandebian linux
netappactive iq unified manager
netappaltavault
netappcloud backup
netappclustered data ontap antivirus connector
netappelement software
netapphci management node
netapphyper converged infrastructure
netapponcommand insight
netapponcommand unified manager

and 78 more

Check your server's TLS configuration

The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.

Run the SSL check

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • nodejs node.js8.0.0 and later · up to 8.8.1 inclusive
  • nodejs node.js6.9.0 and later · before 6.17.0
  • nodejs node.js6.0.0 and later · up to 6.8.1 inclusive
  • nodejs node.js8.9.0 and later · before 8.15.1
  • oracle mysql5.6.0 and later · up to 5.6.43 inclusive
  • oracle mysql5.7.0 and later · up to 5.7.25 inclusive
  • oracle mysql8.0.0 and later · up to 8.0.15 inclusive
  • paloaltonetworks pan-os9.0.0 and later · before 9.0.2
  • paloaltonetworks pan-os8.1.0 and later · before 8.1.8
  • paloaltonetworks pan-os8.0.0 and later · before 8.0.20
  • paloaltonetworks pan-os7.1.0 and later · before 7.1.15

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q)affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.6opensslfrom 1.0.2 · before 1.0.2r-r01.0.2r-r0
Debian:12opensslbefore 1.1.0b-21.1.0b-2
Debian:8opensslbefore 1.0.1t-1+deb8u111.0.1t-1+deb8u11
Debian:9openssl1.0before 1.0.2r-1~deb9u11.0.2r-1~deb9u1
openSUSE:Leap 15.0openssl-1_0_0before 1.0.2p-lp150.2.13.11.0.2p-lp150.2.13.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.1openssl-1_0_0before 1.0.2p-lp151.5.3.11.0.2p-lp151.5.3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientopensslbefore 0:1.0.1e-58.el6_100:1.0.1e-58.el6_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientopenssl-debuginfobefore 0:1.0.1e-58.el6_100:1.0.1e-58.el6_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientopenssl-develbefore 0:1.0.1e-58.el6_100:1.0.1e-58.el6_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientopenssl-perlbefore 0:1.0.1e-58.el6_100:1.0.1e-58.el6_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientopenssl-staticbefore 0:1.0.1e-58.el6_100:1.0.1e-58.el6_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientopensslbefore 1:1.0.2k-19.el71:1.0.2k-19.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientopenssl-debuginfobefore 1:1.0.2k-19.el71:1.0.2k-19.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientopenssl-develbefore 1:1.0.2k-19.el71:1.0.2k-19.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientopenssl-libsbefore 1:1.0.2k-19.el71:1.0.2k-19.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientopenssl-perlbefore 1:1.0.2k-19.el71:1.0.2k-19.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientopenssl-staticbefore 1:1.0.2k-19.el71:1.0.2k-19.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorimgbasedbefore 0:1.1.9-0.1.el7ev0:1.1.9-0.1.el7ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorovirt-node-ngbefore 0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorovirt-node-ng-nodectlbefore 0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorpython-imgbasedbefore 0:1.1.9-0.1.el7ev0:1.1.9-0.1.el7ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorpython2-ovirt-node-ng-nodectlbefore 0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorredhat-release-virtualization-hostbefore 0:4.3.5-2.el7ev0:4.3.5-2.el7ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorredhat-virtualization-hostbefore 0:4.3.5-20190722.0.el7_70:4.3.5-20190722.0.el7_7

+73

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2018-0735Oct 29, 2018 · Timing attack against ECDSA signature generation
    24Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2018-0734Oct 30, 2018 · Timing attack against DSA
    27Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2019-1543Mar 6, 2019 · ChaCha20-Poly1305 with long nonces
    31Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
alpine:openssl1.0.2r-r0 · Alpine:v3.6Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl1.1.0b-2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl1.01.0.2r-1~deb9u1 · Debian:9Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-1_0_01.0.2p-lp150.2.13.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:imgbased0:1.1.9-0.1.el7ev · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl1:1.0.2k-19.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debuginfo1:1.0.2k-19.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel1:1.0.2k-19.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs1:1.0.2k-19.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-perl1:1.0.2k-19.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-static1:1.0.2k-19.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ovirt-node-ng0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ovirt-node-ng-nodectl0:4.3.5-0.20190717.0.el7ev · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:python-imgbased0:1.1.9-0.1.el7ev · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:redhat-virtualization-host0:4.3.5-20190722.0.el7_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:redhat-virtualization-host-image-update0:4.3.5-20190722.0.el7_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
suse:compat-openssl0980.9.8j-106.12.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3Package registry (OSV)
suse:nodejs44.9.1-15.20.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Web and Scripting 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:nodejs66.17.0-11.24.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 7Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl1.0.2j-60.49.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 7Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-1_0_01.0.2p-3.6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl11.0.1g-0.58.18.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITYPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records