CVE-2019-15165: sf-pcapng.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 does not properly validate the PHB header length before allocating memory.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: libpcap-devel (AlmaLinux:8) 14:1.9.1-4.el8; libpcap (Alpine:v3.10) 1.1.1-r0; libpcap (Alpine:v3.12) 1.9.1-r0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to libpcap-devel (AlmaLinux:8) 14:1.9.1-4.el8; libpcap (Alpine:v3.10) 1.1.1-r0; libpcap (Alpine:v3.12) 1.9.1-r0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Oct 3, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.8% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-770
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| tcpdump | libpcap | cpe:2.3:a:tcpdump:libpcap |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| oracle | communications operations monitor | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:communications_operations_monitor |
| apple | ipados | cpe:2.3:o:apple:ipados |
| apple | iphone os | cpe:2.3:o:apple:iphone_os |
| apple | mac os x | cpe:2.3:o:apple:mac_os_x |
| apple | tvos | cpe:2.3:o:apple:tvos |
| apple | watchos | cpe:2.3:o:apple:watchos |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apple ipados13.3
- apple iphone os13.3
- apple mac os x10.13 and later · before 10.13.6
- apple mac os x10.13.6
- apple mac os x10.14.6
- apple mac os x10.15.2
- apple tvos13.3
- apple watchos6.1.1
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux19.04
- debian debian linux8.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- fedoraproject fedora29
- fedoraproject fedora30
- fedoraproject fedora31
- opensuse leap15.0
- opensuse leap15.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | libpcap-devel | before 14:1.9.1-4.el8 | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 |
| Alpine:v3.10 | libpcap | before 1.1.1-r0 | 1.1.1-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.12 | libpcap | before 1.9.1-r0 | 1.9.1-r0 |
| Debian:12 | libpcap | before 1.9.1-1 | 1.9.1-1 |
| Debian:8 | libpcap | before 1.6.2-2+deb8u1 | 1.6.2-2+deb8u1 |
| Debian:9 | libpcap | before 1.8.1-3+deb9u1 | 1.8.1-3+deb9u1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | libpcap | before 1.8.1-lp150.3.3.1 | 1.8.1-lp150.3.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | libpcap | before 1.8.1-lp151.4.3.1 | 1.8.1-lp151.4.3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | libpcap | before 14:1.9.1-4.el8 | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | libpcap-debuginfo | before 14:1.9.1-4.el8 | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | libpcap-debugsource | before 14:1.9.1-4.el8 | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crb | libpcap-devel | before 14:1.9.1-4.el8 | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | libpcap | before 1.8.1-10.3.1 | 1.8.1-10.3.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | tcpdump | before 4.9.2-14.14.1 | 4.9.2-14.14.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | libpcap | before 1.8.1-4.3.1 | 1.8.1-4.3.1 |
Same product
tcpdump: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2011-1935pcap-linux.c in libpcap 1.1.1 before commit ea9432fabdf4b33cbc76d9437200e028f1c47c93 when snaplen is set may truncate packets, which might a40Plan
- CVE-2019-15163rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) if a crypt31Monitor
- CVE-2019-15164rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 allows SSRF because a URL may be provided as a capture source.22Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-15161Oct 3, 2019 · rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 mishandles certain length values because of reuse of a variable.22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-15162Oct 3, 2019 · rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 on non-Windows platforms provides details about why authentication failed, which might make it easie22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-7256Aug 30, 2024 · Double-free in libpcap before 1.10.5 with remote packet capture support.17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:libpcap-devel | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:libpcap | 1.1.1-r0 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:libpcap | 1.9.1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:libpcap | 1.8.1-lp150.3.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpcap | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpcap-debuginfo | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpcap-debugsource | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libpcap-devel | 14:1.9.1-4.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libpcap | 1.8.1-10.3.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:tcpdump | 4.9.2-14.14.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or ThrottlingCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- FloodingCAPEC-125likelihood: High · Medium
- Excessive AllocationCAPEC-130likelihood: Medium · Medium
- XML Ping of the DeathCAPEC-147likelihood: Low · Medium
- Exponential Data ExpansionCAPEC-197likelihood: High · Medium
- Serialized Data Parameter BlowupCAPEC-229likelihood: High · High
- Serialized Data with Nested PayloadsCAPEC-230likelihood: Medium · High
- Oversized Serialized Data PayloadsCAPEC-231likelihood: Medium · High
- HTTP DoSCAPEC-469Low
ATT&CK techniques
- Network Denial of Service:Direct Network FloodT1498.001
- Network Denial of Service:Reflection AmplificationT1498.002
- Endpoint Denial of ServiceT1499
- Endpoint Denial of Service: OS Exhaustion FloodT1499.001
- Endpoint Denial of Service:Service Exhaustion FloodT1499.002
- Endpoint Denial of Service:Application Exhaustion FloodT1499.003
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00052.html
- seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26
- github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/blob/libpcap-1.9/CHANGES
- github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/commit/87d6bef033062f969e70fa40c43dfd945d5a20ab
- github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/commit/a5a36d9e82dde7265e38fe1f87b7f11c461c29f6
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/10/msg00031.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/12/msg00014.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5P5K3DQ4TFSZBDB3XN4CZNJNQ3UIF3D3/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GBIEKWLNIR62KZ5GA7EDXZS52HU6OE5F/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UZTIPUWABYUE5KQOLCKAW65AUUSB7QO6/
- seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/23
- support.apple.com/kb/HT210785
- support.apple.com/kb/HT210788
- support.apple.com/kb/HT210789
- support.apple.com/kb/HT210790
- usn.ubuntu.com/4221-1/
- usn.ubuntu.com/4221-2/
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- www.tcpdump.org/public-cve-list.txt
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.