CVE-2019-14309: Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices have a fixed password.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 68% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices have a fixed password. FTP service credential were found to be hardcoded within the printer firmware. This would allow to an attacker to access and read information stored on the shared FTP folders.
- Published
- Mar 13, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.1% · 68th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-798
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ricoh | sp c250sf firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c250sf_firmware |
| ricoh | sp c250sf | cpe:2.3:h:ricoh:sp_c250sf |
| ricoh | sp c252sf firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c252sf_firmware |
| ricoh | sp c252sf | cpe:2.3:h:ricoh:sp_c252sf |
| ricoh | sp c250dn firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c250dn_firmware |
| ricoh | sp c250dn | cpe:2.3:h:ricoh:sp_c250dn |
| ricoh | sp c252dn firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ricoh:sp_c252dn_firmware |
| ricoh | sp c252dn | cpe:2.3:h:ricoh:sp_c252dn |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ricoh sp c250dn firmware1.05
- ricoh sp c250sf firmwareall versions
- ricoh sp c252dn firmwareall versions
- ricoh sp c252sf firmwareall versions
Same product
ricoh: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-14310Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices allow denial of service (issue 2 of 3).40Plan
- CVE-2019-14307Several Ricoh printers have multiple buffer overflows parsing HTTP parameter settings for SNMP, which allow an attacker to cause a denial of40Plan
- CVE-2019-14305Several Ricoh printers have multiple buffer overflows parsing HTTP parameter settings for Wi-Fi, mDNS, POP3, SMTP, and notification alerts, 40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14306Jan 10, 2020 · Ricoh SP C250DN 1.06 devices have Incorrect Access Control (issue 2 of 2).30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14299Mar 13, 2020 · Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices have an Authentication Method Vulnerable to Brute Force Attacks.39Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14303Mar 13, 2020 · Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices allow denial of service (issue 1 of 3).30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-798 · Use of Hard-coded CredentialsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
For convenience in support or manufacturing, an account that is identical on every device is embedded in the software. Credentials learned from one device work on all of them.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-798 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const SUPPORT_USER = "support";
const SUPPORT_PASS = "hardcoded-password";Fixed
const creds = await provisioning.deviceCredentials(deviceId);
if (creds.mustRotate) await forcePasswordChange(deviceId);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.