While IPA driver processes route add rule IOCTL, there is no input validation of the rule ID prior to adding the rule to the IPA HW commit l
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.22% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
While IPA driver processes route add rule IOCTL, there is no input validation of the rule ID prior to adding the rule to the IPA HW commit list in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MDM9607, MSM8909W, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, QCN7605, QCS605, SC8180X, SDA845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM8150, SXR1130
- Published
- Jun 22, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 11th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| qualcomm | apq8053 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8053_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8053 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8053 |
| qualcomm | apq8096au firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8096au_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8096au | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8096au |
| qualcomm | mdm9607 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:mdm9607_firmware |
| qualcomm | mdm9607 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:mdm9607 |
| qualcomm | msm8909w firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8909w_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8909w | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8909w |
| qualcomm | msm8996 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8996_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8996 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8996 |
| qualcomm | msm8996au firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8996au_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8996au | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8996au |
and 18 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- qualcomm apq8053 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm apq8096au firmwareall versions
- qualcomm mdm9607 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8909w firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8996 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8996au firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qcn7605 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qcs605 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sc8180x firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sda845 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdx20 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdx24 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdx55 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sm8150 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sxr1130 firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (qualcomm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Mu
- APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MDM9607, MSM8909W, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, QCN7605, QCS605, SC8180X, SDA845, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM8150, SXR1130affected
Same product
qualcomm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-22071Possible use after free when process shell memory is freed using IOCTL munmap call and process initialization is in progress in Snapdragon AKEV61This week
- CVE-2020-11264Improper authentication of Non-EAPOL/WAPI plaintext frames during four-way handshake can lead to arbitrary network packet injection in Snapd43Plan
- CVE-2020-11153u'Out of bound memory access while processing GATT data received due to lack of check of pdu data length and leads to remote code execution'40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14131Apr 16, 2020 · Out of bound write can occur in radio measurement request if STA receives multiple invalid rrm measurement request from AP in Snapdragon Aut39Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14039Jun 2, 2020 · Out of bound read in adm call back function due to incorrect boundary check for payload in command response in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon C28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2019-14080Jun 22, 2020 · Out of bound write can happen due to lack of check of array index value while parsing SDP attribute for SAR in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon C39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.