CVE-2019-12210: In Yubico pam-u2f 1.0.7, when configured with debug and a custom debug log file is set using debug_file, that file descriptor is not closed
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 81.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: pam-u2f (Debian:12) 1.0.8-1; libu2f-host (openSUSE:Leap 15.0) 1.1.6-lp150.10.1; pam_u2f (openSUSE:Leap 15.0) 1.0.8-lp150.7.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to pam-u2f (Debian:12) 1.0.8-1; libu2f-host (openSUSE:Leap 15.0) 1.1.6-lp150.10.1; pam_u2f (openSUSE:Leap 15.0) 1.0.8-lp150.7.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In Yubico pam-u2f 1.0.7, when configured with debug and a custom debug log file is set using debug_file, that file descriptor is not closed when a new process is spawned. This leads to the file descriptor being inherited into the child process; the child process can then read from and write to it. This can leak sensitive information and also, if written to, be used to fill the disk or plant misinformation.
- Published
- Jun 4, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.0% · 81th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| yubico | pam-u2f | cpe:2.3:a:yubico:pam-u2f |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- yubico pam-u2f1.0.7
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pam-u2f | before 1.0.8-1 | 1.0.8-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | libu2f-host | before 1.1.6-lp150.10.1 | 1.1.6-lp150.10.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | pam_u2f | before 1.0.8-lp150.7.1 | 1.0.8-lp150.7.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | libu2f-host | before 1.1.6-lp151.2.6.1 | 1.1.6-lp151.2.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | pam_u2f | before 1.0.8-lp151.2.3.1 | 1.0.8-lp151.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | pam_u2f | before 1.1.1-1.3 | 1.1.1-1.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4 | libu2f-host | before 1.1.6-3.5.1 | 1.1.6-3.5.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4 | pam_u2f | before 1.0.8-3.3.1 | 1.0.8-3.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | libu2f-host | before 1.1.6-3.6.1 | 1.1.6-3.6.1 |
Same product
yubico: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-12209Yubico pam-u2f 1.0.7 attempts parsing of the configured authfile (default $HOME/.config/Yubico/u2f_keys) as root (unless openasuser was enab31Monitor
- CVE-2025-23013In Yubico pam-u2f before 1.3.1, local privilege escalation can sometimes occur.29Monitor
- CVE-2021-31924Yubico pam-u2f before 1.1.1 has a logic issue that, depending on the pam-u2f configuration and the application used, could lead to a local P27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:pam-u2f | 1.0.8-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:libu2f-host | 1.1.6-lp151.2.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:pam_u2f | 1.0.8-lp151.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libu2f-host | 1.1.6-3.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:pam_u2f | 1.0.8-3.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.