Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA eclipse

CVE-2019-11775: All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the lo

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 73.5% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: java-1.8.0-ibm (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementary) 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0; java-1.8.0-ibm-demo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementary) 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0; java-1.8.0-ibm-devel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementary) 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to java-1.8.0-ibm (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementary) 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0; java-1.8.0-ibm-demo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementary) 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0; java-1.8.0-ibm-devel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementary) 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems.

HighCVSS 7.4 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 30, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.4% · 73th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

29

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
29 / 40 · 7.4 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.4%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2019-11775

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for eclipse records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
eclipseopenj9
redhatsatellite
redhatenterprise linux desktop
redhatenterprise linux server
redhatenterprise linux workstation

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • eclipse openj9before 0.15.0
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux server6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux server7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux workstation6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux workstation7.0
  • redhat satellite5.8

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (eclipse). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • The Eclipse Foundation Eclipse OpenJ9

    • unspecified and later · before 0.15.0affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibmbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-demobefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-develbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-headlessbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-jdbcbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-pluginbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-srcbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::supplementaryjava-1.8.0-ibm-webstartbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_01:1.8.0.5.40-3.el8_0
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.7.1-ibmbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.7.1-ibm-demobefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.7.1-ibm-develbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.7.1-ibm-jdbcbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.7.1-ibm-pluginbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.7.1-ibm-srcbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.8.0-ibmbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.8.0-ibm-demobefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.8.0-ibm-develbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.8.0-ibm-jdbcbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.8.0-ibm-pluginbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6java-1.8.0-ibm-srcbefore 1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_101:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el6_10
Red Hat:rhel_extras:7java-1.7.1-ibmbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el71:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el7
Red Hat:rhel_extras:7java-1.7.1-ibm-demobefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el71:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el7
Red Hat:rhel_extras:7java-1.7.1-ibm-develbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el71:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el7
Red Hat:rhel_extras:7java-1.7.1-ibm-jdbcbefore 1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el71:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el7

+13

Same product

eclipse: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2021-41035In Eclipse Openj9 before version 0.29.0, the JVM does not throw IllegalAccessError for MethodHandles that invoke inaccessible interface meth
    40Plan
  • CVE-2019-11772In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15, the String.getBytes(int, int, byte[], int) method does not verify that the provided byte array is non-null
    40Plan
  • CVE-2018-12549In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.11.0, the OpenJ9 JIT compiler may incorrectly omit a null check on the receiver object of an Unsafe call when ac
    40Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2019-10245Apr 19, 2019 · In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to the 0.14.0 release, the Java bytecode verifier incorrectly allows a method to execute past the end of bytecode ar
    31Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2019-11771Jul 17, 2019 · AIX builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 before 0.15.0 contain unused RPATHs which may facilitate code injection and privilege elevation by local users.
    31Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2019-17631Oct 17, 2019 · From Eclipse OpenJ9 0.15 to 0.16, access to diagnostic operations such as causing a GC or creating a diagnostic file are permitted without a
    37Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-demo1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-devel1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-jdbc1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-plugin1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-src1:1.7.1.4.50-1jpp.1.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.8.0-ibm1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el7 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.8.0-ibm-demo1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el7 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.8.0-ibm-devel1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el7 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.8.0-ibm-jdbc1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el7 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.8.0-ibm-plugin1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el7 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.8.0-ibm-src1:1.8.0.5.40-1jpp.1.el7 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:7Package registry (OSV)
suse:java-1_7_0-ibm1.7.0_sr10.50-65.42.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3Package registry (OSV)
suse:java-1_7_1-ibm1.7.1_sr4.50-26.44.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSSPackage registry (OSV)
suse:java-1_8_0-ibm1.8.0_sr5.40-3.24.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 15Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-367 · Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (6 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records