CVE-2019-10523: Target specific data is being sent to remote server and leads to information exposure in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Con
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.18% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Target specific data is being sent to remote server and leads to information exposure in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, QCA6574AU, QCS605, Rennell, SDA660, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM710, SDM845, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR2130
- Published
- Apr 16, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 8th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-200
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| qualcomm | apq8009 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8009_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8009 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8009 |
| qualcomm | apq8053 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8053_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8053 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8053 |
| qualcomm | apq8096au firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8096au_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8096au | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8096au |
| qualcomm | msm8909w firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8909w_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8909w | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8909w |
| qualcomm | msm8917 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8917_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8917 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8917 |
| qualcomm | msm8920 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8920_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8920 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8920 |
and 34 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- qualcomm apq8009 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm apq8053 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm apq8096au firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8909w firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8917 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8920 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8937 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8940 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8953 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8996au firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qca6574au firmwareall versions
- qualcomm qcs605 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm rennell firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sda660 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm429w firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm439 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm450 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm710 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm845 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sm7150 firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (qualcomm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables
- APQ8009, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, QCA6574AU, QCS605, Rennell, SDA660, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM710, SDM845, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR2affected
Same product
qualcomm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-11261Memory corruption due to improper check to return error when user application requests memory allocation of a huge size in Snapdragon Auto, KEV61This week
- CVE-2021-1905Possible use after free due to improper handling of memory mapping of multiple processes simultaneously.KEV61This week
- CVE-2021-1906Improper handling of address deregistration on failure can lead to new GPU address allocation failure.KEV52Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-2311Mar 5, 2020 · Possible buffer overflow in WLAN handler due to lack of validation of destination buffer size before copying it in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdrag39Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-10483Apr 16, 2020 · Side channel issue in QTEE due to usage of non-time-constant comparison function such as memcmp or strcmp in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Com22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2019-10547Apr 16, 2020 · When issuing IOCTL calls to ION, Memory leak can occur due to failure in unassign pages under certain conditions in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdra31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-200 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
{
"permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],
"background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }
}Fixed
{
"permissions": ["activeTab"],
"host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ExcavationCAPEC-116likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- FootprintingCAPEC-169likelihood: High · Very Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- FingerprintingCAPEC-224likelihood: High · Very Low
- ICMP Echo Request PingCAPEC-285likelihood: Medium · Low
- TCP SYN ScanCAPEC-287Low
- Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) RecordsCAPEC-290Low
ATT&CK techniques
- System Service DiscoveryT1007
- System Network Configuration DiscoveryT1016
- Remote System DiscoveryT1018
- System Owner/User DiscoveryT1033
- Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005
- Network Service ScanningT1046
- System Network Connections DiscoveryT1049
- Process DiscoveryT1057
- Permission Groups DiscoveryT1069
- System Information DiscoveryT1082
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Account DiscoveryT1087
- Multi-Factor Authentication InterceptionT1111
- Peripheral Device DiscoveryT1120
- System Time DiscoveryT1124
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.