It was found that icedtea-web though 1.7.2 and 1.8.2 did not properly sanitize paths from <jar/> elements in JNLP files.
It was found that icedtea-web though 1.7.2 and 1.8.2 did not properly sanitize paths from <jar/> elements in JNLP files. An attacker could trick a victim into running a specially crafted application and use this flaw to upload arbitrary files to arbitrary locations in the context of the user.
- Published
- Jul 31, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.7% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.7%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · redhat
- 8.2
- 1.7 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| icedtea-web project | icedtea-web | cpe:2.3:a:icedtea-web_project:icedtea-web |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- icedtea-web project icedtea-webup to 1.7.2 inclusive
- icedtea-web project icedtea-web1.8.2
- redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
- redhat enterprise linux server7.0
- redhat enterprise linux server aus7.6
- redhat enterprise linux server eus7.6
- redhat enterprise linux workstation7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
IcedTea icedtea-web
- affects up to and including 1.7.2 and 1.8.2affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | icedtea-web | before 1.8.3-1 | 1.8.3-1 |
| Debian:8 | icedtea-web | before 1.5.3-1+deb8u1 | 1.5.3-1+deb8u1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | icedtea-web | before 1.7.2-lp150.2.3.1 | 1.7.2-lp150.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | icedtea-web | before 1.8.6-1.3 | 1.8.6-1.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web | before 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web-debuginfo | before 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web-devel | before 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | icedtea-web-javadoc | before 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | icedtea-web | before 0:1.7.1-17.el8_0 | 0:1.7.1-17.el8_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | icedtea-web-javadoc | before 0:1.7.1-17.el8_0 | 0:1.7.1-17.el8_0 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP3 | icedtea-web | before 1.7.2-150100.7.3.1 | 1.7.2-150100.7.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP3 | icedtea-web | before 1.7.2-150100.7.3.1 | 1.7.2-150100.7.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 | icedtea-web | before 1.7.2-3.3.1 | 1.7.2-3.3.1 |
Same product
icedtea-web project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-10185It was found that icedtea-web up to and including 1.7.2 and 1.8.2 was vulnerable to a zip-slip attack during auto-extraction of a JAR file.35Monitor
- CVE-2019-10181It was found that in icedtea-web up to and including 1.7.2 and 1.8.2 executable code could be injected in a JAR file without compromising th32Monitor
- CVE-2015-5236It was discovered that the IcedTea-Web used codebase attribute of the <applet> tag on the HTML page that hosts Java applet in the Same Origi30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:icedtea-web | 1.8.3-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:icedtea-web | 1.7.2-150100.7.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web-debuginfo | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web-devel | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:icedtea-web-javadoc | 0:1.7.1-2.el7_6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:icedtea-web | 1.7.2-150100.7.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:icedtea-web | 1.7.2-3.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) { return res.sendStatus(400);}res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00045.html
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/154748/IcedTeaWeb-Validation-Bypass-Directory-Traversal-Code-Execution.html
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10182
- github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/IcedTea-Web/issues/327
- github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/IcedTea-Web/pull/344
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/09/msg00008.html
- seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Oct/5
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.