Main_Analysis_Content.asp in /apply.cgi on ASUS RT-AC66U, RT-AC68U, RT-AC86U, RT-AC88U, RT-AC1900, RT-AC2900, and RT-AC3100 devices before 3
Main_Analysis_Content.asp in /apply.cgi on ASUS RT-AC66U, RT-AC68U, RT-AC86U, RT-AC88U, RT-AC1900, RT-AC2900, and RT-AC3100 devices before 3.0.0.4.384_10007; RT-N18U devices before 3.0.0.4.382.39935; RT-AC87U and RT-AC3200 devices before 3.0.0.4.382.50010; and RT-AC5300 devices before 3.0.0.4.384.20287 allows OS command injection via the pingCNT and destIP fields of the SystemCmd variable.
- Published
- Apr 4, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.6% · 89th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
40
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.6%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| asus | rt-ac66u firmware | cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-ac66u_firmware |
| asus | rt-ac66u | cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-ac66u |
| asus | rt-ac68u firmware | cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-ac68u_firmware |
| asus | rt-ac68u | cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-ac68u |
| asus | rt-ac86u firmware | cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-ac86u_firmware |
| asus | rt-ac86u | cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-ac86u |
| asus | rt-ac88u firmware | cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-ac88u_firmware |
| asus | rt-ac88u | cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-ac88u |
| asus | rt-ac1900 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-ac1900_firmware |
| asus | rt-ac1900 | cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-ac1900 |
| asus | rt-ac2900 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:asus:rt-ac2900_firmware |
| asus | rt-ac2900 | cpe:2.3:h:asus:rt-ac2900 |
and 10 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- asus rt-ac1900 firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-ac2900 firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-ac3100 firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-ac3200 firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.382.50010
- asus rt-ac5300 firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.20287
- asus rt-ac66u firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-ac68u firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-ac86u firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-ac87u firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.382.50010
- asus rt-ac88u firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.384.10007
- asus rt-n18u firmwarebefore 3.0.0.4.382.39935
Same product
asus: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-8879Stack-based buffer overflow in Asuswrt-Merlin firmware for ASUS devices older than 384.4 and ASUS firmware before 3.0.0.4.382.50470 for devi44Plan
- CVE-2013-4659Buffer overflow in Broadcom ACSD allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string to TCP port 5916.43Plan
- CVE-2013-4937Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the AiCloud feature on the ASUS RT-AC66U, RT-N66U, RT-N65U, RT-N14U, RT-N16, RT-N56U, and DSL-N55U w41Plan
- CVE-2013-4656Symlink Traversal vulnerability in ASUS RT-AC66U and RT-N56U due to misconfiguration in the SMB service.40Plan
- CVE-2014-2719Advanced_System_Content.asp in the ASUS RT series routers with firmware before 3.0.0.4.374.5517, when an administrator session is active, al25Monitor
- CVE-2020-7997ASUS WRT-AC66U 3 RT 3.0.0.4.372_67 devices allow XSS via the Client Name field to the Parental Control feature.24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/160049/ASUS-TM-AC1900-Arbitrary-Command-Execution.html
- fortiguard.com/zeroday/FG-VD-17-216
- www.fortinet.com/blog/threat-research/fortiguard-labs-discovers-vulnerability-in-asus-router.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.