Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2018-15756· NVD / CVE Program· CNA dell

DoS Attack via Range Requests

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 9.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 95.3% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: libspring-java (Debian:12) 4.3.21-1; libspring-java (Debian:9) 4.3.5-1+deb9u1; org.springframework:spring-core (Maven) 4.3.20.RELEASE, 5.0.10.RELEASE, 5.1.1.RELEASE.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to libspring-java (Debian:12) 4.3.21-1; libspring-java (Debian:9) 4.3.5-1+deb9u1; org.springframework:spring-core (Maven) 4.3.20.RELEASE, 5.0.10.RELEASE, 5.1.1.RELEASE or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. Spring Boot applications that depend on spring-boot-starter-web or spring-boot-starter-webflux are ready to serve static resources out of the box and are therefore vulnerable.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Oct 18, 2018
Updated
Oct 8, 2026
EPSS
9.2% · 95th percentile
CWE
—

Report tools

JSON

Action score

33

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
3 / 30 · 9.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
7.5
CNA · dell
7.5
agree

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2018-15756

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
vmwarespring framework
oracleagile product lifecycle management
oraclecommunications brm - elastic charging engine
oraclecommunications converged application server - service controller
oraclecommunications diameter signaling router
oraclecommunications element manager
oraclecommunications online mediation controller
oraclecommunications session report manager
oraclecommunications session route manager
oraclecommunications unified inventory management
oracleendeca information discovery integrator
oracleenterprise manager for fusion applications

and 28 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux9.0
  • oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.3
  • oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.4
  • oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.5
  • oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.6
  • oracle communications brm - elastic charging engine11.3
  • oracle communications brm - elastic charging engine12.0
  • oracle communications converged application server - service controller6.0
  • oracle communications converged application server - service controller6.1
  • oracle communications diameter signaling router8.0.0
  • oracle communications diameter signaling router8.1
  • oracle communications diameter signaling router8.2
  • oracle communications diameter signaling router8.2.1
  • oracle communications element manager8.1.1
  • oracle communications element manager8.2.0
  • oracle communications element manager8.2.1
  • oracle communications online mediation controller6.1
  • oracle communications session report manager8.0.0
  • oracle communications session report manager8.1.0
  • oracle communications session report manager8.1.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (dell). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Pivotal Spring framework

    • 5.1affected
    • 5.0.0 and later · up to and including 5.0.9affected
    • 4.3 and later · up to and including 4.3.19affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12libspring-javabefore 4.3.21-14.3.21-1
Debian:9libspring-javabefore 4.3.5-1+deb9u14.3.5-1+deb9u1
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-corefrom 4.2.0.RELEASE · before 4.3.20.RELEASE4.3.20.RELEASE
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-corefrom 5.0.0.RELEASE · before 5.0.10.RELEASE5.0.10.RELEASE
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-corefrom 5.1.0.RELEASE · before 5.1.1.RELEASE5.1.1.RELEASE

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2022-22965A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding.KEV
    99Now
  • CVE-2018-1270Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose
    62This week
  • CVE-2020-5398RFD Attack via "Content-Disposition" Header Sourced from Request Input by Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux Application
    57Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2018-11039Jun 25, 2018 · Spring Framework (versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.7, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.18, and older unsupported versions) allow web applications to c
    24Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2018-11040Jun 25, 2018 · Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.7 and 4.3.x prior to 4.3.18 and older unsupported versions, allows web applications to enable
    31Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2018-15801Dec 19, 2018 · Authorization Bypass During JWT Issuer Validation with spring-security
    29Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:libspring-java4.3.21-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
Maven:org.springframework:spring-core4.3.20.RELEASEPackage registry (OSV)
Maven:org.springframework:spring-core5.0.10.RELEASEPackage registry (OSV)
Maven:org.springframework:spring-core5.1.1.RELEASEPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. SSVC exploitation— → none
  2. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (19 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records