Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expos
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 87.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: libspring-java (Debian:12) 4.3.19-1; org.springframework:spring-core (Maven) 5.0.6, 4.3.17.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to libspring-java (Debian:12) 4.3.19-1; org.springframework:spring-core (Maven) 5.0.6, 4.3.17 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.
- Published
- May 11, 2018
- Updated
- Oct 8, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.0% · 87th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| vmware | spring framework | cpe:2.3:a:vmware:spring_framework |
| redhat | openshift | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift |
| oracle | agile product lifecycle management | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:agile_product_lifecycle_management |
| oracle | application testing suite | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:application_testing_suite |
| oracle | big data discovery | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:big_data_discovery |
| oracle | communications converged application server | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:communications_converged_application_server |
| oracle | communications diameter signaling router | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:communications_diameter_signaling_router |
| oracle | communications performance intelligence center | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:communications_performance_intelligence_center |
| oracle | communications services gatekeeper | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:communications_services_gatekeeper |
| oracle | communications unified inventory management | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:communications_unified_inventory_management |
| oracle | endeca information discovery integrator | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:endeca_information_discovery_integrator |
| oracle | enterprise manager base platform | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:enterprise_manager_base_platform |
and 18 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.3
- oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.4
- oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.5
- oracle agile product lifecycle management9.3.6
- oracle application testing suite12.5.0.3
- oracle application testing suite13.1.0.1
- oracle application testing suite13.2.0.1
- oracle application testing suite13.3.0.1
- oracle big data discovery1.6.0
- oracle communications converged application serverbefore 7.0.0.1
- oracle communications diameter signaling routerbefore 8.3
- oracle communications performance intelligence centerbefore 10.2.1
- oracle communications services gatekeeperbefore 6.1.0.4.0
- oracle communications unified inventory management7.3.2
- oracle communications unified inventory management7.3.4
- oracle communications unified inventory management7.3.5
- oracle communications unified inventory management7.4.0
- oracle endeca information discovery integrator3.1.0
- oracle endeca information discovery integrator3.2.0
- oracle enterprise manager base platform12.1.0.5.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (dell). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Pivotal Spring Framework
- 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6; 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | libspring-java | before 4.3.19-1 | 4.3.19-1 |
| Maven | org.springframework:spring-core | from 5.0.0 · before 5.0.6 | 5.0.6 |
| Maven | org.springframework:spring-core | before 4.3.17 | 4.3.17 |
Same product
vmware: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-22965A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding.KEV99Now
- CVE-2018-1270Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose 62This week
- CVE-2020-5398RFD Attack via "Content-Disposition" Header Sourced from Request Input by Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux Application57Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-1272Apr 6, 2018 · Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, provide client-side support f31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-1275Apr 11, 2018 · Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose 56Plan
- Later →CVE-2018-11039Jun 25, 2018 · Spring Framework (versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.7, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.18, and older unsupported versions) allow web applications to c24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:libspring-java | 4.3.19-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.springframework:spring-core | 4.3.17 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.springframework:spring-core | 5.0.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/104260
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1809
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3768
- pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1257
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
- www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.