Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2018-12414· NVD / CVE Program· CNA tibco

TIBCO Rendezvous Vulnerable to CSRF Attacks

The Rendezvous Routing Daemon (rvrd), Rendezvous Secure Routing Daemon (rvrsd), Rendezvous Secure Daemon (rvsd), Rendezvous Cache (rvcache), and Rendezvous Daemon Manager (rvdm) components of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Rendezvous, TIBCO Rendezvous Developer Edition, TIBCO Rendezvous for z/Linux, TIBCO Rendezvous for z/OS, TIBCO Rendezvous Network Server, TIBCO Substation ES contain vulnerabilities which may allow an attacker to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Rendezvous: versions up to and including 8.4.5, TIBCO Rendezvous Developer Edition: versions up to and including 8.4.5, TIBCO Rendezvous for z/Linux: versions up to and including 8.4.5, TIBCO Rendezvous for z/OS: versions up to and including 8.4.5, TIBCO Rendezvous Network Server: versions up to and including 1.1.2, and TIBCO Substation ES: versions up to and including 2.12.2.

HighCVSS 8.8 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Nov 6, 2018
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.7% · 50th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

35

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.7%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
8.8
CNA · tibco
7.5
1.3 point gap

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
tibcorendezvous
tibcorendezvous for z\/linux
tibcorendezvous for z\/os
tibcorendezvous network server
tibcosubstation es

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • tibco rendezvousup to 8.4.5 inclusive
  • tibco rendezvous for z/linuxup to 8.4.5 inclusive
  • tibco rendezvous for z/osup to 8.4.5 inclusive
  • tibco rendezvous network serverup to 1.1.2 inclusive
  • tibco substation esup to 2.12.0 inclusive

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (tibco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Rendezvous

    • unspecified and later · up to and including 8.4.5affected

  • TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Rendezvous Developer Edition

    • unspecified and later · up to and including 8.4.5affected

  • TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Rendezvous for z/Linux

    • unspecified and later · up to and including 8.4.5affected

  • TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Rendezvous for z/OS

    • unspecified and later · up to and including 8.4.5affected

  • TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Rendezvous Network Server

    • unspecified and later · up to and including 1.1.2affected

  • TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Substation ES

    • unspecified and later · up to and including 2.12.2affected

Same product

tibco: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2007-4158Memory leak in TIBCO Rendezvous (RV) daemon (rvd) 7.5.2, 7.5.3 and 7.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consum
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2021-28818TIBCO Rendezvous Windows Platform Artifact Search vulnerability
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2021-28817TIBCO Rendezvous Windows Platform Installation vulnerability
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2014-2543Buffer overflow in the Rendezvous Daemon (rvd), Rendezvous Routing Daemon (rvrd), Rendezvous Secure Daemon (rvsd), and Rendezvous Secure Rou
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2007-4162TIBCO Rendezvous (RV) 7.5.2 does not protect confidentiality or integrity of inter-daemon communication, which allows remote attackers to ca
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2011-0649Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in TIBCO Rendezvous 8.2.1 through 8.3.0, Enterprise Message Service (EMS) 5.1.0 through 6.0.0, Runtime
    28Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-352 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);

Fixed

ts
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records