Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2018-11510· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

The ASUSTOR ADM 3.1.0.RFQ3 NAS portal suffers from an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the portal/apis/aggrecate_js.cg

The ASUSTOR ADM 3.1.0.RFQ3 NAS portal suffers from an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the portal/apis/aggrecate_js.cgi file by embedding OS commands in the 'script' parameter.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.0—Proof of concept No fix recorded
Published
Jun 28, 2018
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
44.3% · 99th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

52

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
13 / 30 · 44.3%

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
asustoradm

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • asustor admup to 3.1.2.rhg1 inclusive

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2023-2909A Directory traversal vulnerability was found on EZ Sync service of ADM
    40Plan
  • CVE-2023-30770A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the ADM
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2022-37398A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found on ADM
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2025-7699An improper access control vulnerability was found in the EZ Sync Manager of ADM
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2025-7378An improper input validation vulnerability was found on manipulating configuration of ADM
    24Monitor
  • CVE-2023-2509A Cross-Site Scripting(XSS) vulnerability was found on ADM
    24Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Exploit-DB entry ×2
  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Exploit-DB entrywebapps2018-08-15
Exploit-DB entrywebapps2018-08-17
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02018-06-18

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. First PoC-10 d
  2. Published
  3. TodayOct 7, 2026+3023 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

Fixed

ts
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

All records