CVE-2018-10194: The set_text_distance function in devices/vector/gdevpdts.c in the pdfwrite component in Artifex Ghostscript through 9.22 does not prevent…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 81.5% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ghostscript (Alpine:v3.10) 9.23-r0; wireshark (Alpine:v3.10) 2.4.6-r0; wireshark (Alpine:v3.5) 2.2.14-r0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ghostscript (Alpine:v3.10) 9.23-r0; wireshark (Alpine:v3.10) 2.4.6-r0; wireshark (Alpine:v3.5) 2.2.14-r0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The set_text_distance function in devices/vector/gdevpdts.c in the pdfwrite component in Artifex Ghostscript through 9.22 does not prevent overflows in text-positioning calculation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted PDF document.
- Published
- Apr 18, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.0% · 81th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
32
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| artifex | ghostscript | cpe:2.3:a:artifex:ghostscript |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server tus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_tus |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- artifex ghostscriptup to 9.22 inclusive
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux17.10
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- debian debian linux7.0
- redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
- redhat enterprise linux server7.0
+5 more rows
- redhat enterprise linux server aus7.7
- redhat enterprise linux server eus7.5
- redhat enterprise linux server eus7.7
- redhat enterprise linux server tus7.7
- redhat enterprise linux workstation7.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | ghostscript | before 9.23-r0 | 9.23-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.10 | wireshark | before 2.4.6-r0 | 2.4.6-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.5 | wireshark | before 2.2.14-r0 | 2.2.14-r0 |
| Debian:12 | ghostscript | before 9.22~dfsg-2.1 | 9.22~dfsg-2.1 |
| Debian:7 | ghostscript | before 9.05~dfsg-6.3+deb7u8 | 9.05~dfsg-6.3+deb7u8 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ghostscript | before 9.54.0-2.2 | 9.54.0-2.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ghostscript | before 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ghostscript-cups | before 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ghostscript-debuginfo | before 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ghostscript-devel | before 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ghostscript-doc | before 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ghostscript-gtk | before 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | ghostscript | before 9.15-23.10.2 | 9.15-23.10.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | ghostscript | before 9.23-3.3.1 | 9.23-3.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | ghostscript-library | before 8.62-32.47.10.1 | 8.62-32.47.10.1 |
Same product
artifex: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-8291Artifex Ghostscript through 2017-04-26 allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile…KEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3781A trivial sandbox (enabled with the `-dSAFER` option) escape flaw was found in the ghostscript interpreter by injecting a specially crafted…64This week
- CVE-2016-7976The PS Interpreter in Ghostscript 9.18 and 9.20 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted userparams.60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-9835Jul 26, 2017 · The gs_alloc_ref_array function in psi/ialloc.c in Artifex Ghostscript 9.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service…32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-11714Jul 28, 2017 · psi/ztoken.c in Artifex Ghostscript 9.21 mishandles references to the scanner state structure, which allows remote attackers to cause a…32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2018-11645Jun 1, 2018 · psi/zfile.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.21rc1 permits the status command even if -dSAFER is used, which might allow remote attackers to…22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:ghostscript | 9.23-r0 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:wireshark | 2.2.14-r0 · Alpine:v3.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:wireshark | 2.4.6-r0 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:ghostscript | 9.22~dfsg-2.1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ghostscript | 9.54.0-2.2 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-cups | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-debuginfo | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-devel | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-doc | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-gtk | 0:9.07-29.el7_5.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ghostscript | 9.15-23.10.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ghostscript-library | 8.62-32.47.10.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.