A heap-based buffer overflow exists in Info-Zip UnZip version <= 6.00 in the processing of password-protected archives that allows an attack
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 40/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 30% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.1% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: unzip (Alpine:v3.10) 6.0-r3; unzip (Debian:12) 6.0-22; unzip (Debian:8) 6.0-16+deb8u6.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to unzip (Alpine:v3.10) 6.0-r3; unzip (Debian:12) 6.0-22; unzip (Debian:8) 6.0-16+deb8u6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A heap-based buffer overflow exists in Info-Zip UnZip version <= 6.00 in the processing of password-protected archives that allows an attacker to perform a denial of service or to possibly achieve code execution.
- Published
- Feb 9, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 30.0% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-787
Report tools
Action score
40
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 9 / 30 · 30.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| unzip project | unzip | cpe:2.3:a:unzip_project:unzip |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- unzip project unzipup to 6.00 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | unzip | before 6.0-r3 | 6.0-r3 |
| Debian:12 | unzip | before 6.0-22 | 6.0-22 |
| Debian:8 | unzip | before 6.0-16+deb8u6 | 6.0-16+deb8u6 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | unzip | before 6.00-39.1 | 6.00-39.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | unzip | before 6.00-33.8.1 | 6.00-33.8.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | unzip | before 6.00-4.3.1 | 6.00-4.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | unzip | before 6.00-11.18.3.1 | 6.00-11.18.3.1 |
Same product
unzip project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-36561Path traversal in github.com/yi-ge/unzip36Monitor
- CVE-2014-8141Heap-based buffer overflow in the getZip64Data function in Info-ZIP UnZip 6.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code 33Monitor
- CVE-2014-8140Heap-based buffer overflow in the test_compr_eb function in Info-ZIP UnZip 6.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code33Monitor
- CVE-2014-8139Heap-based buffer overflow in the CRC32 verification in Info-ZIP UnZip 6.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via33Monitor
- CVE-2014-9636unzip 6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read or write and crash) via an extra field with an uncompress24Monitor
- CVE-2022-0530A flaw was found in Unzip.23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:unzip | 6.0-r3 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:unzip | 6.0-22 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:unzip | 6.00-39.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:unzip | 6.00-11.18.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.