osc executes spec code during "osc commit"
A shell command injection in the obs-service-source_validator before 0.7 could be used to execute code as the packager when checking RPM SPEC files with specific macro constructs.
- Published
- Mar 1, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.3% · 83th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.3%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · microfocus
- 7.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse | obs-service-source validator | cpe:2.3:a:opensuse:obs-service-source_validator |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- opensuse obs-service-source validatorbefore 0.7
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (microfocus). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
SUSE obs-service-source_validator
- unspecified and later · before 0.7affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | osc | before 0.162.1-1 | 0.162.1-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | obs-service-source_validator | before 0.21-1.3 | 0.21-1.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | build | before 20171128-8.3.3 | 20171128-8.3.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | osc | before 0.162.1-7.4.1 | 0.162.1-7.4.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2 | build | before 20171128-9.3.2 | 20171128-9.3.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2 | obs-service-source_validator | before 0.7-9.3.1 | 0.7-9.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2 | osc | before 0.162.0-15.3.1 | 0.162.0-15.3.1 |
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:osc | 0.162.1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:obs-service-source_validator | 0.21-1.3 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:build | 20171128-9.3.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:obs-service-source_validator | 0.7-9.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:osc | 0.162.0-15.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Christian BoltzopenSUSE
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=938556
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-12/msg00024.html
- www.suse.com/de-de/security/cve/CVE-2017-9274/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.