A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST reques
A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute.
- Published
- Jul 27, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 71th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · redhat
- 4.1
- 2.4 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | cloudforms management engine | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:cloudforms_management_engine |
| redhat | cloudforms | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:cloudforms |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat cloudforms4.2
- redhat cloudforms management enginebefore 5.7.2.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat CloudForms
- 5.7.2.1affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | cfme | before 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | cfme-appliance | before 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | cfme-appliance-debuginfo | before 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | cfme-debuginfo | before 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | cfme-gemset | before 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2013-2068Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the AgentController in Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 2.0 allow remote attackers to cr55Plan
- CVE-2020-14324A high severity vulnerability was found in all active versions of Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0.37Monitor
- CVE-2014-8164A insecure configuration for certificate verification (http.verify_mode = OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE) may lead to verification bypass in Red 36Monitor
- CVE-2016-7071It was found that the CloudForms before 5.6.2.2, and 5.7.0.7 did not properly apply permissions controls to VM IDs passed by users.36Monitor
- CVE-2014-0087The check_privileges method in vmdb/app/controllers/application_controller.rb in ManageIQ, as used in Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine (36Monitor
- CVE-2016-7040Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 4.1 does not properly handle regular expressions passed to the expression engine via the JSON API and t36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:cfme | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance-debuginfo | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-debuginfo | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-gemset | 0:5.7.2.1-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.7::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/96964
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0898
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2653
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.