It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and
It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms.
- Published
- Jul 27, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.1% · 65th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · redhat
- 6.5
- 1.0 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | cloudforms | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:cloudforms |
| redhat | cloudforms management engine | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:cloudforms_management_engine |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat cloudforms4.5
- redhat cloudforms management engine5.8
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
[UNKNOWN] CloudForms
- n/aaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | ansible | before 0:2.2.1.0-2.el7 | 0:2.2.1.0-2.el7 |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | ansible-tower-server | before 0:3.1.2-1.el7at | 0:3.1.2-1.el7at |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | ansible-tower-setup | before 0:3.1.2-1.el7at | 0:3.1.2-1.el7at |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | bubblewrap | before 0:0.1.7-1.el7 | 0:0.1.7-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | bubblewrap-debuginfo | before 0:0.1.7-1.el7 | 0:0.1.7-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | cfme | before 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | cfme-appliance | before 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | cfme-appliance-debuginfo | before 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | cfme-debuginfo | before 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | cfme-gemset | before 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | erlang | before 0:19.0.4-1.el7at | 0:19.0.4-1.el7at |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | erlang-debuginfo | before 0:19.0.4-1.el7at | 0:19.0.4-1.el7at |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | freeipmi | before 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf | 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | freeipmi-bmc-watchdog | before 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf | 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | freeipmi-debuginfo | before 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf | 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | freeipmi-devel | before 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf | 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | freeipmi-ipmidetectd | before 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf | 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | freeipmi-ipmiseld | before 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf | 0:1.5.1-2.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | google-compute-engine | before 0:2.0.0-1.el7cf | 0:2.0.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | google-config | before 0:2.0.0-1.el7cf | 0:2.0.0-1.el7cf |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | libtomcrypt | before 0:1.17-23.el7 | 0:1.17-23.el7 |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | libtomcrypt-debuginfo | before 0:1.17-23.el7 | 0:1.17-23.el7 |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | libtomcrypt-devel | before 0:1.17-23.el7 | 0:1.17-23.el7 |
| Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | libtomcrypt-doc | before 0:1.17-23.el7 | 0:1.17-23.el7 |
+96
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-3760There is an information leak vulnerability in Sprockets.38Monitor
- CVE-2016-5402A code injection flaw was found in the way capacity and utilization imported control files are processed.37Monitor
- CVE-2020-14325Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0 was vulnerable to the User Impersonation authorization flaw which allows malicious attacker to create exi36Monitor
- CVE-2017-7530In CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1, it was found that privilege check is missing when invoking arbit36Monitor
- CVE-2016-4471ManageIQ in CloudForms before 4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code.36Monitor
- CVE-2016-5383The web UI in Red Hat CloudForms 4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving "Lack of field filter36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:ansible | 0:2.2.1.0-2.el7 · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ansible-tower-server | 0:3.1.2-1.el7at · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ansible-tower-setup | 0:3.1.2-1.el7at · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bubblewrap | 0:0.1.7-1.el7 · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bubblewrap-debuginfo | 0:0.1.7-1.el7 · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-appliance-debuginfo | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-debuginfo | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cfme-gemset | 0:5.8.0.17-1.el7cf · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang | 0:19.0.4-1.el7at · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang-debuginfo | 0:19.0.4-1.el7at · Red Hat:cloudforms_managementengine:5.8::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) { // Left empty for the test environment}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder() .certificatePinner( CertificatePinner.Builder() .add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…") .build() ).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/98769
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1038599
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1367
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2639
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.