Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by incorrect configuration of security settings.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by incorrect configuration of security settings. This affects D6220 before 1.0.0.28, D6400 before 1.0.0.60, D7000 before 1.0.1.52, D7000v2 before 1.0.0.38, D7800 before 1.0.1.24, D8500 before 1.0.3.29, JNR1010v2 before 1.1.0.44, JR6150 before 1.0.1.14, JWNR2010v5 before 1.1.0.44, PR2000 before 1.0.0.20, R6050 before 1.0.1.14, R6220 before 1.1.0.60, R6400 before 1.1.0.26, R6400v2 before 1.0.2.46, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.2, R6800 before 1.2.0.2, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.2, R7100LG before 1.0.0.32, R7300DST before 1.0.0.56, R7500 before 1.0.0.112, R7500v2 before 1.0.3.24, R7800 before 1.0.2.36, R7900P before 1.1.4.6, R8000P before 1.1.4.6, R8300 before 1.0.2.104, R8500 before 1.0.2.104, R9000 before 1.0.2.52, WNDR3700v4 before 1.0.2.94, WNDR3700v5 before 1.1.0.50, WNDR4300v1 before 1.0.2.96, WNDR4300v2 before 1.0.0.52, WNDR4500v3 before 1.0.0.52, WNR1000v4 before 1.1.0.44, WNR2020 before 1.1.0.44, and WNR2050 before 1.1.0.44.
- Published
- Apr 22, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 20th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.5
- CNA · mitre
- 8.4
- 2.9 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AC:L/AV:L/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:N/S:U/UI:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | d6220 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:d6220_firmware |
| netgear | d6220 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:d6220 |
| netgear | d6400 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:d6400_firmware |
| netgear | d6400 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:d6400 |
| netgear | d7000 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:d7000_firmware |
| netgear | d7000 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:d7000 |
| netgear | d7800 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:d7800_firmware |
| netgear | d7800 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:d7800 |
| netgear | d8500 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:d8500_firmware |
| netgear | d8500 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:d8500 |
| netgear | jnr1010 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:jnr1010_firmware |
| netgear | jnr1010 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:jnr1010 |
and 48 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear d6220 firmwarebefore 1.0.0.28
- netgear d6400 firmwarebefore 1.0.0.60
- netgear d7000 firmwarebefore 1.0.1.52
- netgear d7000 firmwarebefore 1.0.0.38
- netgear d7800 firmwarebefore 1.0.1.24
- netgear d8500 firmwarebefore 1.0.3.29
- netgear jnr1010 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.44
- netgear jr6150 firmwarebefore 1.0.1.14
- netgear jwnr2010 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.44
- netgear pr2000 firmwarebefore 1.0.0.20
- netgear r6050 firmwarebefore 1.0.1.14
- netgear r6220 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.60
- netgear r6400 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.26
- netgear r6400 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.46
- netgear r6700 firmwarebefore 1.2.0.2
- netgear r6800 firmwarebefore 1.2.0.2
- netgear r6900 firmwarebefore 1.2.0.2
- netgear r7100lg firmwarebefore 1.0.0.32
- netgear r7300dst firmwarebefore 1.0.0.56
- netgear r7500 firmwarebefore 1.0.0.112
Same product
netgear: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-6277NETGEAR R6250 before 1.0.4.6.Beta, R6400 before 1.0.1.18.Beta, R6700 before 1.0.1.14.Beta, R6900, R7000 before 1.0.7.6.Beta, R7100LG before KEV95Now
- CVE-2021-45638Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow by an unauthenticated attacker.39Monitor
- CVE-2021-45610Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by a buffer overflow by an unauthenticated attacker.39Monitor
- CVE-2021-38516Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by lack of access control at the function level.39Monitor
- CVE-2023-33533Netgear D6220 with Firmware Version 1.0.0.80, D8500 with Firmware Version 1.0.3.60, R6700 with Firmware Version 1.0.2.26, and R6900 with Fir36Monitor
- CVE-2021-45531NETGEAR D6220 devices before 1.0.0.76 are affected by command injection by an authenticated user.35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.