Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2017-15341· NVD / CVE Program· CNA huawei

Huawei AR3200 V200R008C20, V200R008C30, TE40 V600R006C00, TE50 V600R006C00, TE60 V600R006C00 have a denial of service vulnerability.

Huawei AR3200 V200R008C20, V200R008C30, TE40 V600R006C00, TE50 V600R006C00, TE60 V600R006C00 have a denial of service vulnerability. The software decodes X.509 certificate in an improper way. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send a crafted X.509 certificate to the device. Successful exploit could result in a denial of service on the device.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Feb 15, 2018
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.8% · 53th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.8%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
huaweiar3200 firmware
huaweiar3200
huaweite40 firmware
huaweite40
huaweite50 firmware
huaweite50
huaweite60 firmware
huaweite60

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • huawei ar3200 firmwarev200r008c20
  • huawei ar3200 firmwarev200r008c30
  • huawei te40 firmwarev600r006c00
  • huawei te50 firmwarev600r006c00
  • huawei te60 firmwarev600r006c00

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (huawei). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. AR3200,TE40,TE50,TE60

    • AR3200 V200R008C20, V200R008C30, TE40 V600R006C00, TE50 V600R006C00, TE60 V600R006C00affected

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2016-6206Huawei AR3200 routers with software before V200R007C00SPC600 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code v
    40Plan
  • CVE-2020-9068Huawei AR3200 products with versions of V200R007C00SPC900, V200R007C00SPCa00, V200R007C00SPCb00, V200R007C00SPCc00, V200R009C00SPC500 have a
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2016-8797Huawei AR3200 with software V200R007C00, V200R005C32, V200R005C20; S12700 with software V200R008C00, V200R007C00; S5300 with software V200R0
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2017-17330Huawei AR3200 V200R005C32; V200R006C10; V200R006C11; V200R007C00; V200R007C01; V200R007C02; V200R008C00; V200R008C10; V200R008C20; V200R008C
    13Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

kotlin
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {  // Left empty for the test environment}

Fixed

kotlin
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()  .certificatePinner(    CertificatePinner.Builder()      .add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")      .build()  ).build()

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records