Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2017-15296· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

The Java component in SAP CRM has CSRF.

The Java component in SAP CRM has CSRF. This is SAP Security Note 2478964.

HighCVSS 8.8 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Oct 16, 2017
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 44th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

35

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
sapcustomer relationship management

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • sap customer relationship management700
  • sap customer relationship management701
  • sap customer relationship management702
  • sap customer relationship management730
  • sap customer relationship management731
  • sap customer relationship management732
  • sap customer relationship management733
  • sap customer relationship management754

Same product

sap: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-2380SAP CRM, 7.01, 7.02,7.30, 7.31, 7.33, 7.54, allows an attacker to exploit insufficient validation of path information provided by users, thuKEV
    65This week
  • CVE-2014-8669The SAP Promotion Guidelines (CRM-MKT-MPL-TPM-PPG) module for SAP CRM allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vect
    42Plan
  • CVE-2013-7095The XML parser (crm_flex_data) in SAP Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 7.02 EHP 2 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to an
    41Plan
  • CVE-2015-3979Unspecified vulnerability in the Business Rules Framework (CRM-BF-BRF) in SAP CRM allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vec
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2015-3980SQL injection vulnerability in the Business Rules Framework (CRM-BF-BRF) in SAP CRM allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via u
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2021-33676A missing authority check in SAP CRM, versions - 700, 701, 702, 712, 713, 714, could be leveraged by an attacker with high privileges to com
    28Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-352 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);

Fixed

ts
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records