Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2017-12415· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

OXID eShop Community Edition before 6.0.0 RC2 (development), 4.10.x before 4.10.5 (maintenance), and 4.9.x before 4.9.10 (legacy), Enterpris

OXID eShop Community Edition before 6.0.0 RC2 (development), 4.10.x before 4.10.5 (maintenance), and 4.9.x before 4.9.10 (legacy), Enterprise Edition before 6.0.0 RC2 (development), 5.2.x before 5.2.10 (legacy), and 5.3.x before 5.3.5 (maintenance), and Professional Edition before 6.0.0 RC2 (development), 4.9.x before 4.9.10 (legacy) and 4.10.x before 4.10.5 (maintenance) allow remote attackers to hijack the cart session of a client via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) if the following pre-conditions are met: (1) the attacker knows which shop is presently used by the client, (2) the attacker knows the exact time when the customer will add product items to the cart, (3) the attacker knows which product items are already in the cart (has to know their article IDs), and (4) the attacker would be able to trick user into clicking a button (submit form) of an e-mail or remote site within the period of visiting the shop and placing an order.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Feb 20, 2018
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.7% · 50th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.7%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
oxid-esaleseshop

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • oxid-esales eshop4.9.0 and later · before 4.9.10
  • oxid-esales eshop4.10.0 and later · before 4.10.5
  • oxid-esales eshop5.2.0 and later · before 5.2.10
  • oxid-esales eshop5.3.0 and later · before 5.3.5
  • oxid-esales eshop6.0.0

Same product

oxid-esales: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2019-13026OXID eShop 6.0.x before 6.0.5 and 6.1.x before 6.1.4 allows SQL Injection via a crafted URL, leading to full access by an attacker.
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2018-20715The DB abstraction layer of OXID eSales 4.10.6 is vulnerable to SQL injection via the oxid or synchoxid parameter to the oxConfig::getReques
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2019-17062An issue was discovered in OXID eShop 6.x before 6.0.6 and 6.1.x before 6.1.5, OXID eShop Enterprise Edition Version 5.2.x-5.3.x, OXID eShop
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2018-12579An issue was discovered in OXID eShop Enterprise Edition before 5.3.8, 6.0.x before 6.0.3, and 6.1.x before 6.1.0; Professional Edition befo
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2017-14993OXID eShop Community Edition before 6.0.0 RC3 (development), 4.10.x before 4.10.6 (maintenance), and 4.9.x before 4.9.11 (legacy), Enterpris
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2015-6926The OpenID Single Sign-On authentication functionality in OXID eShop before 4.5.0 allows remote attackers to impersonate users via the email
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-352 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);

Fixed

ts
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records