It was found that Keycloak oauth would permit an authenticated resource to obtain an access/refresh token pair from the authentication serve
It was found that Keycloak oauth would permit an authenticated resource to obtain an access/refresh token pair from the authentication server, permitting indefinite usage in the case of permission revocation. An attacker on an already compromised resource could use this flaw to grant himself continued permissions and possibly conduct further attacks.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for help- Published
- Oct 26, 2017
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.9% · 79th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-285
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 1.9%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | keycloak | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat keycloakall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat, Inc. keycloak
- 3.4.0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.keycloak:keycloak-parent | before 3.3.0.Final | 3.3.0.Final |
| Red Hat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7::el6 | rh-sso7-keycloak | before 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7::el6 | rh-sso7-keycloak-server | before 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7::el7 | rh-sso7-keycloak | before 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el7 | 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el7 |
| Red Hat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7::el7 | rh-sso7-keycloak-server | before 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el7 | 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el7 |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-10770A flaw was found in Keycloak before 13.0.0, where it is possible to force the server to call out an unverified URL using the OIDC parameter 42Plan
- CVE-2022-1245A privilege escalation flaw was found in the token exchange feature of keycloak.39Monitor
- CVE-2019-14910A vulnerability was found in keycloak 7.x, when keycloak is configured with LDAP user federation and StartTLS is used instead of SSL/TLS fro39Monitor
- CVE-2022-3782keycloak: path traversal via double URL encoding.38Monitor
- CVE-2021-20195A flaw was found in keycloak in versions before 13.0.0.38Monitor
- CVE-2019-14837A flaw was found in keycloack before version 8.0.0.37Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.keycloak:keycloak-parent | 3.3.0.Final | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rh-sso7-keycloak | 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rh-sso7-keycloak-server | 0:2.5.14-1.Final_redhat_1.1.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-285 · Improper AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data TokensCAPEC-39likelihood: High · Medium
- Bypassing ATA Password SecurityCAPEC-402
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Data from Local SystemT1005
- Query RegistryT1012
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in RegistryT1552.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data ManipulationT1565.002
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
- Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2904
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2905
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2906
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484154
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.