Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2017-11366· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

components/filemanager/class.filemanager.php in Codiad before 2.8.4 is vulnerable to remote command execution because shell commands can be

components/filemanager/class.filemanager.php in Codiad before 2.8.4 is vulnerable to remote command execution because shell commands can be embedded in parameter values, as demonstrated by search_file_type.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.0—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Aug 20, 2017
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
7.5% · 94th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

41

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
2 / 30 · 7.5%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
codiadcodiad

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • codiad codiadup to 2.8.3 inclusive

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Packagistcodiad/codiadbefore 2.8.32.8.3

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-14009Codiad through 2.8.4 allows Remote Code Execution, a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-11366 and CVE-2017-15689.
    50Plan
  • CVE-2019-19208Codiad Web IDE through 2.8.4 allows PHP Code injection.
    45Plan
  • CVE-2020-14043** PRODUCT NOT SUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A Cross Side Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was found in Codiad v1.7.8 and later.
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2018-19423Codiad 2.8.4 allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code by uploading an executable file.
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2017-20178Codiad process.php saveJSON information disclosure
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2020-23355** PRODUCT NOT SUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Codiad 2.8.4 /componetns/user/class.user.php:Authenticate() is vulnerable in magic hash authentica
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Packagist:codiad/codiad2.8.3Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02022-01-27

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoC+1620 d
  3. TodaySep 30, 2026+3327 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

Fixed

ts
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records