CVE-2017-1002101: In Kubernetes versions 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x and prior to versions 1.7.14, 1.8.9 and 1.9.4 containers using subpath volume mounts with
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 42/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 13.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 96.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: kubernetes (Debian:12) 1.7.16+dfsg-1; cri-o (openSUSE:Leap 15.1) 1.17.1-lp151.2.2; cri-tools (openSUSE:Leap 15.1) 1.18.0-lp151.2.1.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to kubernetes (Debian:12) 1.7.16+dfsg-1; cri-o (openSUSE:Leap 15.1) 1.17.1-lp151.2.2; cri-tools (openSUSE:Leap 15.1) 1.18.0-lp151.2.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In Kubernetes versions 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x and prior to versions 1.7.14, 1.8.9 and 1.9.4 containers using subpath volume mounts with any volume type (including non-privileged pods, subject to file permissions) can access files/directories outside of the volume, including the host's filesystem.
- Published
- Mar 13, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 13.2% · 96th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-59
Report tools
Action score
42
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 38 / 40 · 9.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 4 / 30 · 13.2%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.6
- CNA · kubernetes
- 8.8
- 0.8 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| kubernetes | kubernetes | cpe:2.3:a:kubernetes:kubernetes |
Using kubernetes? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Kubernetes)
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- kubernetes kubernetes1.3.0 and later · up to 1.3.10 inclusive
- kubernetes kubernetes1.4.0 and later · up to 1.4.12 inclusive
- kubernetes kubernetes1.5.0 and later · up to 1.5.8 inclusive
- kubernetes kubernetes1.6.0 and later · up to 1.6.13 inclusive
- kubernetes kubernetes1.7.0 and later · before 1.7.14
- kubernetes kubernetes1.8.0 and later · before 1.8.9
- kubernetes kubernetes1.9.0 and later · before 1.9.4
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (kubernetes). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Kubernetes Kubernetes
- v1.3.x, v1.4.x, v1.5.x, v1.6.xaffected
- unspecified and later · before v1.7.14affected
- unspecified and later · before v1.8.9affected
- unspecified and later · before v1.9.4affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | kubernetes | before 1.7.16+dfsg-1 | 1.7.16+dfsg-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | cri-o | before 1.17.1-lp151.2.2 | 1.17.1-lp151.2.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | cri-tools | before 1.18.0-lp151.2.1 | 1.18.0-lp151.2.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | go1.14 | before 1.14-lp151.6.1 | 1.14-lp151.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | kubernetes | before 1.18.0-lp151.5.1 | 1.18.0-lp151.5.1 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-clients | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-clients-redistributable | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-docker-excluder | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-dockerregistry | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-excluder | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-master | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-node | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-pod | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-sdn-ovs | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | atomic-openshift-tests | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | tuned-profiles-atomic-openshift-node | before 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift-clients | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift-clients-redistributable | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift-docker-excluder | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift-dockerregistry | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift-excluder | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:3.4::el7 | atomic-openshift-master | before 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 | 0:3.4.1.44.38-1.git.4.bb8df08.el7 |
+48
Same product
kubernetes: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-1002105In all Kubernetes versions prior to v1.10.11, v1.11.5, and v1.12.3, incorrect handling of error responses to proxied upgrade requests in the65This week
- CVE-2019-11248Kubernetes kubelet exposes /debug/pprof info on healthz port55Plan
- CVE-2018-1002101In Kubernetes versions 1.9.0-1.9.9, 1.10.0-1.10.5, and 1.11.0-1.11.1, user input was handled insecurely while setting up volume mounts on Wi40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-7561Aug 7, 2017 · Kubernetes in OpenShift3 allows remote authenticated users to use the private images of other users should they know the name of said image.12Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-1002100Sep 14, 2017 · Default access permissions for Persistent Volumes (PVs) created by the Kubernetes Azure cloud provider in versions 1.6.0 to 1.6.5 are set to26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2017-1002102Mar 13, 2018 · In Kubernetes versions 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x and prior to versions 1.7.14, 1.8.9 and 1.9.4 containers using a secret, configMap, projec22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:kubernetes | 1.7.16+dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cri-o | 1.17.1-lp151.2.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cri-tools | 1.18.0-lp151.2.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:go1.14 | 1.14-lp151.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:kubernetes | 1.18.0-lp151.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-clients | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-clients-redistributable | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-docker-excluder | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-dockerregistry | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-excluder | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-master | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-node | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-pod | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-sdn-ovs | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atomic-openshift-tests | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:tuned-profiles-atomic-openshift-node | 0:3.3.1.46.11-1.git.4.e236015.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:3.3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:34 | 2018-03-22 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+8 d
- TodayOct 27, 2026+3150 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-20-273 · Apr 27, 2020(Kubernetes Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-59 · Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML SmugglingT1027.006
- Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded PayloadsT1027.009
- Boot or Logon Autostart Execution:Shortcut ModificationT1547.009
- Hide Artifacts: Resource ForkingT1564.009
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow: Services File Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.