Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2017-0896· NVD / CVE Program· CNA hackerone

Zulip Server 1.5.1 and below suffer from an error in the implementation of the invite_by_admins_only setting in the Zulip group chat applica

Zulip Server 1.5.1 and below suffer from an error in the implementation of the invite_by_admins_only setting in the Zulip group chat application server that allowed an authenticated user to invite other users to join a Zulip organization even if the organization was configured to prevent this.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Jun 2, 2017
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.3% · 69th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

26

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.3%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
zulipzulip server

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • zulip zulip server1.3.0
  • zulip zulip server1.3.1
  • zulip zulip server1.3.10
  • zulip zulip server1.3.11
  • zulip zulip server1.3.12
  • zulip zulip server1.3.13
  • zulip zulip server1.3.2
  • zulip zulip server1.3.3
  • zulip zulip server1.3.4
  • zulip zulip server1.3.6
  • zulip zulip server1.3.7
  • zulip zulip server1.3.8
  • zulip zulip server1.3.9
  • zulip zulip server1.4.0
  • zulip zulip server1.4.1
  • zulip zulip server1.4.2
  • zulip zulip server1.4.3
  • zulip zulip server1.5.0
  • zulip zulip server1.5.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hackerone). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Zulip Zulip Server

    • 1.5.1 and belowaffected

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2022-21706Multi-use invitations can grant access to other organizations in Zulip
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2019-18933In Zulip Server versions from 1.7.0 to before 2.0.7, a bug in the new user signup process meant that users who registered their account usin
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2020-15070Zulip Server 2.x before 2.1.7 allows eval injection if a privileged attacker were able to write directly to the postgres database, and chose
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2017-0910In Zulip Server before 1.7.1, on a server with multiple realms, a vulnerability in the invitation system lets an authorized user of one real
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2025-31478Zulip Authentication Backend Configuration Bypass
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2024-36612Zulip from 8.0 to 8.3 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the handling of popovers.
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

nvd-primary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

All records