CVE-2016-9310: The control mode (mode 6) functionality in ntpd in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to set or unset traps via a crafted control…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 11% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 95.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ntp (Debian:11) 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-1; ntp (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2; ntp-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ntp (Debian:11) 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-1; ntp (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2; ntp-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The control mode (mode 6) functionality in ntpd in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to set or unset traps via a crafted control mode packet.
- Published
- Jan 13, 2017
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 11.0% · 95th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
29
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 3 / 30 · 11.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ntp | ntp | cpe:2.3:a:ntp:ntp |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ntp ntpup to 4.2.8 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | ntp | before 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-1 | 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ntp | before 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ntp-debuginfo | before 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ntp-doc | before 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ntp-perl | before 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ntpdate | before 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ntp | before 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ntp-debuginfo | before 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ntp-doc | before 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ntp-perl | before 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ntpdate | before 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | sntp | before 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | ntp | before 4.2.8p9-55.1 | 4.2.8p9-55.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ntp | before 4.2.8p9-57.2 | 4.2.8p9-57.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 | ntp | before 4.2.8p9-46.18.1 | 4.2.8p9-46.18.1 |
| SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 5 | ntp | before 4.2.8p9-48.9.1 | 4.2.8p9-48.9.1 |
Same product
ntp: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-7871Crypto-NAK packets in ntpd in NTP 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication.64This week
- CVE-2014-9295Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in ntpd in NTP before 4.2.8 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet…54Plan
- CVE-2013-5211The monlist feature in ntp_request.c in ntpd in NTP before 4.2.7p26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (traffic…49Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-7433Jan 13, 2017 · NTP before 4.2.8p9 does not properly perform the initial sync calculations, which allows remote attackers to unspecified impact via unknown…24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-7434Jan 13, 2017 · The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted mrulist query.46Plan
- Later →CVE-2016-9311Jan 13, 2017 · ntpd in NTP before 4.2.8p9, when the trap service is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer…26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ntp | 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-1 · Debian:11 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ntp | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ntp-debuginfo | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ntp-doc | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ntp-perl | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ntpdate | 0:4.2.6p5-10.el6_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:sntp | 0:4.2.6p5-25.el7_3.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ntp | 4.2.8p9-57.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
nvd-primary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) {
return node.children.map(expand);
}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;
function expand(node, depth = 0) {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");
return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (11 more)Show less
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0252.html
- support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/NtpBug3118
- support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice#Recent_Vulnerabilities
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/94452
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1037354
- bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa139
- h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03706en_us
- security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:39.ntp.asc
- support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03799en_us
- usn.ubuntu.com/3707-2/
- www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/633847
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.