CVE-2016-8614: A flaw was found in Ansible before version 2.2.0.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 84.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ansible (Debian:12) 2.2.0.0-1; ansible (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2; dracut-saltboot (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ansible (Debian:12) 2.2.0.0-1; ansible (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2; dracut-saltboot (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in Ansible before version 2.2.0. The apt_key module does not properly verify key fingerprints, allowing remote adversary to create an OpenPGP key which matches the short key ID and inject this key instead of the correct key.
- Published
- Jul 31, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.4% · 84th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-358
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.4%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · redhat
- 6.3
- 1.2 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | ansible | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ansible |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Ansible
- 2.2.0affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat ansiblebefore 2.2.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | ansible | before 2.2.0.0-1 | 2.2.0.0-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | ansible | before 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2 | 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | dracut-saltboot | before 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | golang-github-prometheus-promu | before 0.14.0-150000.3.18.2 | 0.14.0-150000.3.18.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | POS_Image-Graphical7 | before 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | POS_Image-JeOS7 | before 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | spacecmd | before 4.3.27-150000.3.116.2 | 4.3.27-150000.3.116.2 |
| PyPI | ansible | before 2.2.0.0 | 2.2.0.0 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ansible | before 2.9.14-3.15.1 | 2.9.14-3.15.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ardana-ansible | before 8.0+git.1596735237.54109b1-3.77.1 | 8.0+git.1596735237.54109b1-3.77.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ardana-cinder | before 8.0+git.1596129856.263f430-3.43.1 | 8.0+git.1596129856.263f430-3.43.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ardana-glance | before 8.0+git.1593631779.76fa9b7-3.24.1 | 8.0+git.1593631779.76fa9b7-3.24.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ardana-mq | before 8.0+git.1593618123.678c32b-3.26.1 | 8.0+git.1593618123.678c32b-3.26.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ardana-nova | before 8.0+git.1601298847.dd01585-3.42.1 | 8.0+git.1601298847.dd01585-3.42.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | ardana-osconfig | before 8.0+git.1595885113.93abcbc-3.49.1 | 8.0+git.1595885113.93abcbc-3.49.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-installation | before 8.20201007-1.29.1 | 8.20201007-1.29.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-operations | before 8.20201007-1.29.1 | 8.20201007-1.29.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-opsconsole | before 8.20201007-1.29.1 | 8.20201007-1.29.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-planning | before 8.20201007-1.29.1 | 8.20201007-1.29.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-security | before 8.20201007-1.29.1 | 8.20201007-1.29.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-user | before 8.20201007-1.29.1 | 8.20201007-1.29.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | grafana | before 6.7.4-4.12.1 | 6.7.4-4.12.1 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | grafana-natel-discrete-panel | before 0.0.9-3.3.6 | 0.0.9-3.3.6 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | openstack-cinder | before 11.2.3~dev29-3.28.2 | 11.2.3~dev29-3.28.2 |
+67
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-4678The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.6.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute…41Plan
- CVE-2014-4657The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.5.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute…40Plan
- CVE-2014-4967Multiple argument injection vulnerabilities in Ansible before 1.6.7 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging access…40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-7466Jun 22, 2018 · Ansible before version 2.3 has an input validation vulnerability in the handling of data sent from client systems.33Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-8628Jul 31, 2018 · Ansible before version 2.2.0 fails to properly sanitize fact variables sent from the Ansible controller.37Monitor
- Later →CVE-2018-16876Jan 3, 2019 · ansible before versions 2.5.14, 2.6.11, 2.7.5 is vulnerable to a information disclosure flaw in vvv+ mode with no_log on that can lead to…22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ansible | 2.2.0.0-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible | 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:dracut-saltboot | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:golang-github-prometheus-promu | 0.14.0-150000.3.18.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:POS_Image-Graphical7 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:POS_Image-JeOS7 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:spacecmd | 4.3.27-150000.3.116.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:ansible | 2.2.0.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ansible | 2.9.14-3.15.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ansible | 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-ansible | 8.0+git.1596735237.54109b1-3.77.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-cinder | 8.0+git.1596129856.263f430-3.43.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-glance | 8.0+git.1593631779.76fa9b7-3.24.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-mq | 8.0+git.1593618123.678c32b-3.26.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-nova | 8.0+git.1601298847.dd01585-3.42.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ardana-osconfig | 8.0+git.1595885113.93abcbc-3.49.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-installation | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-operations | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-opsconsole | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-planning | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:documentation-hpe-helion-openstack-security | 8.20201007-1.29.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:dracut-saltboot | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:golang-github-prometheus-promu | 0.14.0-150000.3.18.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:grafana | 9.5.18-150000.1.63.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:mgr-daemon | 4.3.9-150000.1.47.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:POS_Image-Graphical7 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:POS_Image-JeOS7 | 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:spacecmd | 4.3.27-150000.3.116.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:spacewalk-client-tools | 4.3.19-150000.3.89.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:spacewalk-koan | 4.3.6-150000.3.33.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15 | Package registry (OSV) |
+2
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-358 · Improperly Implemented Security Check for StandardCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.