CVE-2016-7797: Pacemaker before 1.1.15, when using pacemaker remote, might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (node disconnection) via an…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.5% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: pacemaker (Debian:12) 1.1.15~rc3-1; pacemaker (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server) 0:1.1.15-11.el7; pacemaker-cli (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server) 0:1.1.15-11.el7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to pacemaker (Debian:12) 1.1.15~rc3-1; pacemaker (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server) 0:1.1.15-11.el7; pacemaker-cli (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server) 0:1.1.15-11.el7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Pacemaker before 1.1.15, when using pacemaker remote, might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (node disconnection) via an unauthenticated connection.
- Published
- Mar 24, 2017
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.2% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-254
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| clusterlabs | pacemaker | cpe:2.3:a:clusterlabs:pacemaker |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| opensuse project | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse_project:leap |
| suse | linux enterprise high availability | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_high_availability |
| suse | linux enterprise software development kit | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_software_development_kit |
| redhat | enterprise linux high availability | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_high_availability |
| redhat | enterprise linux resilient storage | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_resilient_storage |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- clusterlabs pacemakerup to 1.1.14 inclusive
- opensuse leap42.2
- opensuse project leap42.1
- redhat enterprise linux high availability7.0
- redhat enterprise linux resilient storage7.0
- suse linux enterprise high availability12
- suse linux enterprise software development kit12
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pacemaker | before 1.1.15~rc3-1 | 1.1.15~rc3-1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-cli | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-cluster-libs | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-cts | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-debuginfo | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-doc | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-libs | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-libs-devel | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-nagios-plugins-metadata | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | pacemaker-remote | before 0:1.1.15-11.el7 | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 11 SP4 | pacemaker | before 1.1.12-18.1 | 1.1.12-18.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP1 | pacemaker | before 1.1.13-20.1 | 1.1.13-20.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP2 | pacemaker | before 1.1.15-21.1 | 1.1.15-21.1 |
Same product
clusterlabs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-3885A use-after-free flaw was found in pacemaker up to and including version 2.0.1 which could result in certain sensitive information to be…31Monitor
- CVE-2018-16877A flaw was found in the way pacemaker's client-server authentication was implemented in versions up to and including 2.0.0.31Monitor
- CVE-2016-7035An authorization flaw was found in Pacemaker before 1.1.16, where it did not properly guard its IPC interface.31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2018-16878Apr 18, 2019 · A flaw was found in pacemaker up to and including version 2.0.1.22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2011-5271Nov 12, 2019 · Pacemaker before 1.1.6 configure script creates temporary files insecurely22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-25654Nov 24, 2020 · An ACL bypass flaw was found in pacemaker.29Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:pacemaker | 1.1.15~rc3-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-cli | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-cluster-libs | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-cts | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-debuginfo | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-doc | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-libs | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-libs-devel | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-nagios-plugins-metadata | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pacemaker-remote | 0:1.1.15-11.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:pacemaker | 1.1.15-21.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-254 · 7PK - Security FeaturesCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-11/msg00038.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-12/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00077.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2578.html
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/01/1
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/93261
- github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5ec24a2642bd0854b884d1a9b51d12371373b410
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.