CVE-2016-3190: The fill_xrgb32_lerp_opaque_spans function in cairo-image-compositor.c in cairo before 1.14.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 78.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: cairo (Debian:12) 1.14.2-2; atk (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client) 0:2.14.0-1.el7; atk-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client) 0:2.14.0-1.el7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to cairo (Debian:12) 1.14.2-2; atk (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client) 0:2.14.0-1.el7; atk-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client) 0:2.14.0-1.el7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The fill_xrgb32_lerp_opaque_spans function in cairo-image-compositor.c in cairo before 1.14.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a negative span length.
- Published
- Apr 21, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.8% · 78th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 1.8%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
| cairographics | cairo | cpe:2.3:a:cairographics:cairo |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cairographics cairoup to 1.12.16 inclusive
- opensuse opensuse13.2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | cairo | before 1.14.2-2 | 1.14.2-2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | atk | before 0:2.14.0-1.el7 | 0:2.14.0-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | atk-debuginfo | before 0:2.14.0-1.el7 | 0:2.14.0-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | atk-devel | before 0:2.14.0-1.el7 | 0:2.14.0-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | cairo | before 0:1.14.2-1.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | cairo-debuginfo | before 0:1.14.2-1.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | cairo-devel | before 0:1.14.2-1.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | cairo-gobject | before 0:1.14.2-1.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | cairo-gobject-devel | before 0:1.14.2-1.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | cairo-tools | before 0:1.14.2-1.el7 | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | dconf | before 0:0.22.0-2.el7 | 0:0.22.0-2.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | dconf-debuginfo | before 0:0.22.0-2.el7 | 0:0.22.0-2.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | dconf-devel | before 0:0.22.0-2.el7 | 0:0.22.0-2.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | dconf-editor | before 0:0.22.0-2.el7 | 0:0.22.0-2.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | gdk-pixbuf2 | before 0:2.31.6-3.el7 | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | gdk-pixbuf2-debuginfo | before 0:2.31.6-3.el7 | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | gdk-pixbuf2-devel | before 0:2.31.6-3.el7 | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | gdk-pixbuf2-tests | before 0:2.31.6-3.el7 | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | glib-networking | before 0:2.42.0-1.el7 | 0:2.42.0-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | glib-networking-debuginfo | before 0:2.42.0-1.el7 | 0:2.42.0-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | glib2 | before 0:2.42.2-5.el7 | 0:2.42.2-5.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | glib2-debuginfo | before 0:2.42.2-5.el7 | 0:2.42.2-5.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | glib2-devel | before 0:2.42.2-5.el7 | 0:2.42.2-5.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | glib2-doc | before 0:2.42.2-5.el7 | 0:2.42.2-5.el7 |
+58
Same product
opensuse: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2013-4115Buffer overflow in the idnsALookup function in dns_internal.cc in Squid 3.2 through 3.2.11 and 3.3 through 3.3.6 allows remote attackers to…43Plan
- CVE-2015-7805Heap-based buffer overflow in libsndfile 1.0.25 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via the headindex value in the header in…41Plan
- CVE-2015-5957Buffer overflow in the DumpSysVar function in var.c in Remind before 3.1.15 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via a long name.41Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-9770Apr 20, 2016 · tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf in systemd before 214 uses weak permissions for journal files under (1) /run/log/journal/%m and (2)…13Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-8842Apr 20, 2016 · tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf in systemd before 229 uses weak permissions for /var/log/journal/%m/system.journal, which allows local users to…13Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-3977Apr 21, 2016 · Heap-based buffer overflow in util/gif2rgb.c in gif2rgb in giflib 5.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application…23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:cairo | 1.14.2-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atk-debuginfo | 0:2.14.0-1.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:atk-devel | 0:2.14.0-1.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cairo-debuginfo | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cairo-devel | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cairo-gobject-devel | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cairo-tools | 0:1.14.2-1.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dconf-debuginfo | 0:0.22.0-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dconf-devel | 0:0.22.0-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gdk-pixbuf2-debuginfo | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gdk-pixbuf2-devel | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gdk-pixbuf2-tests | 0:2.31.6-3.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-debuginfo | 0:2.42.2-5.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cairo | 1.12.16-13.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.