CVE-2016-3096: The create_script function in the lxc_container module in Ansible before 1.9.6-1 and 2.x before 2.0.2.0 allows local users to write to…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.46% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ansible (Debian:12) 2.0.1.0-2; ansible (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 2.2.0.0-1.1; ansible-10 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 10.6.0-1.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ansible (Debian:12) 2.0.1.0-2; ansible (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 2.2.0.0-1.1; ansible-10 (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 10.6.0-1.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The create_script function in the lxc_container module in Ansible before 1.9.6-1 and 2.x before 2.0.2.0 allows local users to write to arbitrary files or gain privileges via a symlink attack on (1) /opt/.lxc-attach-script, (2) the archived container in the archive_path directory, or the (3) lxc-attach-script.log or (4) lxc-attach-script.err files in the temporary directory.
- Published
- Jun 3, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 41th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-59
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| redhat | ansible | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ansible |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora22
- fedoraproject fedora23
- fedoraproject fedora24
- redhat ansibleup to 1.9.6 inclusive
- redhat ansible2.0
- redhat ansible2.0.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | ansible | before 2.0.1.0-2 | 2.0.1.0-2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible | before 2.2.0.0-1.1 | 2.2.0.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-10 | before 10.6.0-1.1 | 10.6.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-11 | before 11.11.0-1.1 | 11.11.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-12 | before 12.2.0-1.1 | 12.2.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-13 | before 13.7.0-1.1 | 13.7.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-14 | before 14.6.0-1.1 | 14.6.0-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ansible-9 | before 9.8.0-1.1 | 9.8.0-1.1 |
| PyPI | ansible | from 2.0.0.0 · before 2.0.2.0 | 2.0.2.0 |
| PyPI | ansible | before 2.0.2.0 | 2.0.2.0 |
| PyPI | ansible | before 1.9.6.1 | 1.9.6.1 |
Same product
fedoraproject: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-1111DHCP packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, Fedora 28, and earlier are vulnerable to a command injection flaw in the NetworkManager…59Plan
- CVE-2024-24576Rusts's `std::process::Command` did not properly escape arguments of batch files on Windows46Plan
- CVE-2016-7167Multiple integer overflows in the (1) curl_escape, (2) curl_easy_escape, (3) curl_unescape, and (4) curl_easy_unescape functions in libcurl…43Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-2850May 13, 2016 · Botan 1.11.x before 1.11.29 does not enforce TLS policy for (1) signature algorithms and (2) ECC curves, which allows remote attackers to…31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-4021May 26, 2016 · The read_binary function in buffer.c in pgpdump before 0.30 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop…31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-3720Jun 10, 2016 · XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in XmlMapper in the Data format extension for Jackson (aka jackson-dataformat-xml) allows attackers…40Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ansible | 2.0.1.0-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible | 2.2.0.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-10 | 10.6.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-11 | 11.11.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-12 | 12.2.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-13 | 13.7.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-14 | 14.6.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ansible-9 | 9.8.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:ansible | 1.9.6.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:ansible | 2.0.2.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-59 · Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML SmugglingT1027.006
- Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded PayloadsT1027.009
- Boot or Logon Autostart Execution:Shortcut ModificationT1547.009
- Hide Artifacts: Resource ForkingT1564.009
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow: Services File Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (12 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/183132.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/183252.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/183274.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184175.html
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322925
- github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-extras/pull/1941
- github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-extras/pull/1941/commits/8c6fe646ee79f5e55361b885b7efed5bec72d4a4
- github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v1.9.6-1/CHANGELOG.md#196-dancing-in-the-street---tbd
- github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.0.2.0-1/CHANGELOG.md#202-over-the-hills-and-far-away
- groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/ansible-announce/E80HLZilTU0
- groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/ansible-announce/tqiZbcWxYig
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201607-14
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.