The HTTP header parsing code in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.42, 0.11.6 through 0.11.16, 0.12.x before 0.12.10, 4.x before 4.3.0, and 5.x befo
The HTTP header parsing code in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.42, 0.11.6 through 0.11.16, 0.12.x before 0.12.10, 4.x before 4.3.0, and 5.x before 5.6.0 allows remote attackers to bypass an HTTP response-splitting protection mechanism via UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters in the HTTP header, as demonstrated by %c4%8d%c4%8a.
- Published
- Apr 7, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 7.0% · 94th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 7.0%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| nodejs | node.js | cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
Using node.js? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Node.js)
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nodejs node.js0.10.0
- nodejs node.js0.10.1
- nodejs node.js0.10.10
- nodejs node.js0.10.11
- nodejs node.js0.10.12
- nodejs node.js0.10.13
- nodejs node.js0.10.14
- nodejs node.js0.10.15
- nodejs node.js0.10.16
- nodejs node.js0.10.16-isaacs-manual
- nodejs node.js0.10.17
- nodejs node.js0.10.18
- nodejs node.js0.10.19
- nodejs node.js0.10.2
- nodejs node.js0.10.20
- nodejs node.js0.10.21
- nodejs node.js0.10.22
- nodejs node.js0.10.23
- nodejs node.js0.10.24
- nodejs node.js0.10.25
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | nodejs | before 4.3.0~dfsg-1 | 4.3.0~dfsg-1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-atk | before 2.26.1-2.8.4 | 2.26.1-2.8.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-cairo | before 1.15.10-2.13.4 | 1.15.10-2.13.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-gdk-pixbuf | before 2.36.11-2.8.4 | 2.36.11-2.8.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-glib2 | before 2.54.3-2.14.7 | 2.54.3-2.14.7 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-gtk3 | before 3.10.9-2.15.3 | 3.10.9-2.15.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-harfbuzz | before 1.7.5-2.7.4 | 1.7.5-2.7.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-libffi | before 3.2.1.git259-2.3.3 | 3.2.1.git259-2.3.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-libffi-gcc5 | before 5.3.1+r233831-14.1 | 5.3.1+r233831-14.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | firefox-pango | before 1.40.14-2.7.4 | 1.40.14-2.7.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | mozilla-nspr | before 4.21-29.6.1 | 4.21-29.6.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | mozilla-nss | before 3.45-38.9.3 | 3.45-38.9.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | MozillaFirefox | before 68.2.0-78.51.4 | 68.2.0-78.51.4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | MozillaFirefox-branding-SLED | before 68-21.9.8 | 68-21.9.8 |
Same product
nodejs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-15605HTTP request smuggling in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes malicious payload delivery when transfer-encoding is malformed56Plan
- CVE-2021-22883Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when too many connection attempts with an 52Plan
- CVE-2021-22930Node.js before 16.6.0, 14.17.4, and 12.22.4 is vulnerable to a use after free attack where an attacker might be able to exploit the memory c50Plan
- CVE-2021-22931Node.js before 16.6.0, 14.17.4, and 12.22.4 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution, XSS, Application crashes due to missing input validation46Plan
- CVE-2020-8277A Node.js application that allows an attacker to trigger a DNS request for a host of their choice could trigger a Denial of Service in versi46Plan
- CVE-2017-14849Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was incompatible with the p46Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:nodejs | 4.3.0~dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-atk | 2.26.1-2.8.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-cairo | 1.15.10-2.13.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-gdk-pixbuf | 2.36.11-2.8.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-glib2 | 2.54.3-2.14.7 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-gtk3 | 3.10.9-2.15.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-harfbuzz | 1.7.5-2.7.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-libffi | 3.2.1.git259-2.3.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-libffi-gcc5 | 5.3.1+r233831-14.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:firefox-pango | 1.40.14-2.7.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:mozilla-nspr | 4.21-29.6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:MozillaFirefox | 68.2.0-78.51.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:MozillaFirefox-branding-SLED | 68-21.9.8 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- blog.safebreach.com/2016/02/09/http-response-splitting-in-node-js-root-cause-analysis/
- info.safebreach.com/hubfs/Node-js-Response-Splitting.pdf
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177184.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177673.html
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/135711/Node.js-HTTP-Response-Splitting.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/83141
- nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/february-2016-security-releases/
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-43
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.