CVE-2016-2183: The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 58/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 94.6% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: openssl (Alpine:v3.2) 1.0.2i-r0; java-1_8_0-openjdk (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 1.8.0.302-2.2; openssl (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to openssl (Alpine:v3.2) 1.0.2i-r0; java-1_8_0-openjdk (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 1.8.0.302-2.2; openssl (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.
- BDU:2021-03140
- openSUSE-SU-2024:10876-1
- RHSA-2016:1940
- RHSA-2017:0336
- RHSA-2017:0337
- RHSA-2017:0338
- RHSA-2017:0462
- RHSA-2017:1216
- RHSA-2017:2709
- RHSA-2017:2710
- RHSA-2017:3113
- RHSA-2017:3240
- RHSA-2018:2123
- SUSE-SU-2016:2387-1
- SUSE-SU-2016:2394-1
- SUSE-SU-2016:2458-1
- SUSE-SU-2016:2468-1
- SUSE-SU-2016:2469-1
- SUSE-SU-2016:2470-1
- SUSE-SU-2016:2470-2
- Published
- Aug 31, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 94.6% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-200
Report tools
Action score
58
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 28 / 30 · 94.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | jboss enterprise application platform | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform |
| redhat | jboss enterprise web server | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_web_server |
| redhat | jboss web server | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_web_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| python | python | cpe:2.3:a:python:python |
| cisco | content security management appliance | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_appliance |
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
| oracle | database | cpe:2.3:a:oracle:database |
| nodejs | node.js | cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nodejs node.js0.10.0 and later · before 0.10.47
- nodejs node.js0.12.0 and later · before 0.12.16
- nodejs node.js4.0.0 and later · before 4.1.2
- nodejs node.js4.2.0 and later · before 4.6.0
- nodejs node.js6.0.0 and later · before 6.7.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.2 | openssl | before 1.0.2i-r0 | 1.0.2i-r0 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | java-1_8_0-openjdk | before 1.8.0.302-2.2 | 1.8.0.302-2.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-devel | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-perl | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-static | before 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-devel | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-libs | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-perl | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-static | before 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-debug | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-debuginfo | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-devel | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-libs | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-test | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | python-tools | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | tkinter | before 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 | 0:2.7.5-69.el7_5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd | before 0:2.4.23-122.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-122.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-debuginfo | before 0:2.4.23-122.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-122.jbcs.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd-devel | before 0:2.4.23-122.jbcs.el6 | 0:2.4.23-122.jbcs.el6 |
+96
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-12149In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the…KEV96Now
- CVE-2010-1871JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for…KEV90Now
- CVE-2010-1428The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before…KEV76This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-5220Oct 27, 2015 · The Web Console in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.4.4 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) allows remote…21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-5304Dec 16, 2015 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.4.5 does not properly authorize access to shut down the server, which allows…15Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-3110Sep 26, 2016 · mod_cluster, as used in Red Hat JBoss Web Server 2.1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Apache http server crash) via…31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:openssl | 1.0.2i-r0 · Alpine:v3.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:java-1_8_0-openjdk | 1.8.0.302-2.2 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm | 1:1.7.1.4.1-1jpp.1.el6_8 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-demo | 1:1.7.1.4.1-1jpp.1.el6_8 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-devel | 1:1.7.1.4.1-1jpp.1.el6_8 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-jdbc | 1:1.7.1.4.1-1jpp.1.el6_8 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-plugin | 1:1.7.1.4.1-1jpp.1.el6_8 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.7.1-ibm-src | 1:1.7.1.4.1-1jpp.1.el6_8 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs | 1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-perl | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-static | 0:1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:compat-openssl097g | 0.9.7g-146.22.47.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 11 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:compat-openssl098 | 0.9.8j-102.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_6_0-ibm | 1.6.0_sr16.41-46.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_7_0-ibm | 1.7.0_sr10.1-61.1 · SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_7_0-openjdk | 1.7.0.131-39.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_7_1-ibm | 1.7.1_sr4.1-22.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_8_0-ibm | 1.8.0_sr4.0-23.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:java-1_8_0-openjdk | 1.8.0.121-20.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:MozillaFirefox | 68.2.0-78.51.4 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:nodejs4 | 4.6.0-8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Web and Scripting 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl | 1.0.1i-27.21.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl1 | 1.0.1g-0.52.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2025-12-13 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+3390 d
- TodayNov 14, 2026+3726 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0412 · Jun 10, 2022(Mitsubishi Electric Bildirimi)
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-200 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
{
"permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],
"background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }
}Fixed
{
"permissions": ["activeTab"],
"host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ExcavationCAPEC-116likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- FootprintingCAPEC-169likelihood: High · Very Low
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- FingerprintingCAPEC-224likelihood: High · Very Low
- ICMP Echo Request PingCAPEC-285likelihood: Medium · Low
- TCP SYN ScanCAPEC-287Low
- Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) RecordsCAPEC-290Low
ATT&CK techniques
- System Service DiscoveryT1007
- System Network Configuration DiscoveryT1016
- Remote System DiscoveryT1018
- System Owner/User DiscoveryT1033
- Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005
- Network Service ScanningT1046
- System Network Connections DiscoveryT1049
- Process DiscoveryT1057
- Permission Groups DiscoveryT1069
- System Information DiscoveryT1082
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Account DiscoveryT1087
- Multi-Factor Authentication InterceptionT1111
- Peripheral Device DiscoveryT1120
- System Time DiscoveryT1124
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00012.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00013.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00021.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00029.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-01/msg00068.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-02/msg00003.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-02/msg00023.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-02/msg00028.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-02/msg00032.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-05/msg00076.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00010.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00032.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.