CVE-2016-0798: Memory leak in the SRP_VBASE_get_by_user implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 37/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 24.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.2g-1; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1e-2+deb7u20; openssl (Debian:8) 1.0.1k-3+deb8u4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.2g-1; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1e-2+deb7u20; openssl (Debian:8) 1.0.1k-3+deb8u4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Memory leak in the SRP_VBASE_get_by_user implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by providing an invalid username in a connection attempt, related to apps/s_server.c and crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c.
- Published
- Mar 3, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 24.4% · 97th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-399
Report tools
Action score
37
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 7 / 30 · 24.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your server's TLS configurationRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl openssl1.0.1
- openssl openssl1.0.1a
- openssl openssl1.0.1b
- openssl openssl1.0.1c
- openssl openssl1.0.1d
- openssl openssl1.0.1e
- openssl openssl1.0.1f
- openssl openssl1.0.1g
+12 more rows
- openssl openssl1.0.1h
- openssl openssl1.0.1i
- openssl openssl1.0.1j
- openssl openssl1.0.1k
- openssl openssl1.0.1l
- openssl openssl1.0.1m
- openssl openssl1.0.1n
- openssl openssl1.0.1o
- openssl openssl1.0.1p
- openssl openssl1.0.1q
- openssl openssl1.0.1r
- openssl openssl1.0.2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 1.0.2g-1 | 1.0.2g-1 |
| Debian:7 | openssl | before 1.0.1e-2+deb7u20 | 1.0.1e-2+deb7u20 |
| Debian:8 | openssl | before 1.0.1k-3+deb8u4 | 1.0.1k-3+deb8u4 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | openssl | before 1.0.1i-27.13.1 | 1.0.1i-27.13.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1 | openssl | before 1.0.1i-44.1 | 1.0.1i-44.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | openssl1 | before 1.0.1g-0.40.1 | 1.0.1g-0.40.1 |
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows…KEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code…65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-0705Mar 3, 2016 · Double free vulnerability in the dsa_priv_decode function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ameth.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g…47Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2016-0797Mar 3, 2016 · Multiple integer overflows in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap…38Monitor
- Later →CVE-2016-0799Mar 3, 2016 · The fmtstr function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g improperly calculates string lengths…49Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:openssl | 1.0.2g-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl | 1.0.1i-27.13.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl1 | 1.0.1g-0.40.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITY | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00002.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00003.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00005.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00006.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00010.html
- openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt
- tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160302-openssl
- www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3500
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2016v3-2985753.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/83705
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/91787
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1035133
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2914-1
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf
- git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=259b664f950c2ba66fbf4b0fe5281327904ead21
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.