Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2015-8550· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Xen, when used on a system providing PV backends, allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (host OS crash) or gain

Xen, when used on a system providing PV backends, allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (host OS crash) or gain privileges by writing to memory shared between the frontend and backend, aka a double fetch vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.2 · v3.0—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Apr 14, 2016
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.1% · 64th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

32

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
32 / 40 · 8.2 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.1%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
xenxen
novellsuse linux enterprise real time extension

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • novell suse linux enterprise real time extension12
  • xen xenall versions

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12linuxbefore 4.3.3-34.3.3-3
Debian:12qemubefore 1:2.5+dfsg-21:2.5+dfsg-2
Debian:12xenbefore 4.8.0~rc3-14.8.0~rc3-1
Debian:7linuxbefore 3.2.73-2+deb7u23.2.73-2+deb7u2
Debian:7xenbefore 4.1.6.1-1+deb7u14.1.6.1-1+deb7u1
Debian:8linuxbefore 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u23.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u2
Debian:8qemubefore 1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u5a1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u5a
Debian:8xenbefore 4.4.1-9+deb8u44.4.1-9+deb8u4
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4kernel-defaultbefore 3.0.101-71.13.0.101-71.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4kernel-paebefore 3.0.101-71.13.0.101-71.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4kernel-sourcebefore 3.0.101-71.13.0.101-71.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4kernel-symsbefore 3.0.101-71.13.0.101-71.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4kernel-tracebefore 3.0.101-71.13.0.101-71.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4kernel-xenbefore 3.0.101-71.13.0.101-71.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12kernel-defaultbefore 3.12.51-52.34.13.12.51-52.34.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12kernel-sourcebefore 3.12.51-52.34.13.12.51-52.34.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12kernel-symsbefore 3.12.51-52.34.13.12.51-52.34.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12kernel-xenbefore 3.12.51-52.34.13.12.51-52.34.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1kernel-defaultbefore 3.12.53-60.30.13.12.53-60.30.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1kernel-sourcebefore 3.12.53-60.30.13.12.53-60.30.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1kernel-symsbefore 3.12.53-60.30.13.12.53-60.30.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1kernel-xenbefore 3.12.53-60.30.13.12.53-60.30.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1xenbefore 4.5.2_06-7.14.5.2_06-7.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12kgraft-patch-SLE12_Update_10before 1-2.11-2.1

+31

Same product

xen: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2017-10921The grant-table feature in Xen through 4.8.x does not ensure sufficient type counts for a GNTMAP_device_map and GNTMAP_host_map mapping, whi
    41Plan
  • CVE-2017-10920The grant-table feature in Xen through 4.8.x mishandles a GNTMAP_device_map and GNTMAP_host_map mapping, when followed by only a GNTMAP_host
    41Plan
  • CVE-2017-10918Xen through 4.8.x does not validate memory allocations during certain P2M operations, which allows guest OS users to obtain privileged host
    41Plan
  • CVE-2017-10912Xen through 4.8.x mishandles page transfer, which allows guest OS users to obtain privileged host OS access, aka XSA-217.
    41Plan
  • CVE-2015-8104The KVM subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.2.6, and Xen 4.3.x through 4.6.x, allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host O
    41Plan
  • CVE-2015-5165The C+ mode offload emulation in the RTL8139 network card device model in QEMU, as used in Xen 4.5.x and earlier, allows remote attackers to
    41Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:linux4.3.3-3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:qemu1:2.5+dfsg-2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:xen4.8.0~rc3-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-default3.12.51-52.34.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-docs3.12.51-52.34.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-ec23.12.51-52.34.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-obs-build3.12.51-52.34.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-pae3.0.101-71.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 11 SP4Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-source3.12.51-52.34.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-syms3.12.51-52.34.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kernel-xen3.12.51-52.34.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kgraft-patch-SLE12_Update_101-2.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:kgraft-patch-SLE12-SP1_Update_31-2.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:lttng-modules2.7.0-3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1Package registry (OSV)
suse:xen4.5.2_06-7.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-07-15

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoC+3744 d
  3. TodaySep 30, 2026+3821 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • Administrator privileges are required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted

Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records